Submited on: 03 Sep 2012 04:28:31 PM GMT
Published on: 03 Sep 2012 06:37:22 PM GMT
interdisciplinary
Posted by Mr. Neil Mcewan on 15 Sep 2012 01:16:07 PM GMT

In reply to some comments by Dr Bhattacharjee on the influence of external gravity, including the idea of planets as archetypes:

 

1) I fully accept archetypes are not attached to scientific method.
2) The moon is known to exert tidal influence on the womb. Any planetary influence would be correspondingly subtle.
3) Dr Bhattacharjee's proposition of neutral boyancy is intrinsically rhythmic. I make the assumption 'neutral boyancy' might enable gravity to be 'felt' which is very subtle.
4) The fact that rhythm enables structures to develop in the cell I think is significant. The DNA that controls 'switching' (dark DNA) has to be read rhythmically. It is my contention that, since the end product of growth is highly structured rhythmically, it has to be controlled rhythmically. The mechanism or way the switches are 'read' I don't know, but it seems cellular rhythms might play a part.

5) On the subject of archetypes. Chinese herbalism uses traditional energy centres and charts, along with conventional western science. The two are not necessarily exclusive. The same emight apply here.

  • Invited by the author to make a review on this article? :
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    bioscience degree & biotech

  • Publications in the same or a related area of science: No
  • References: None
 
Report abuse
 
Inspirational
Posted by Ms. Ruhi Rizvi on 22 Sep 2012 01:58:02 PM GMT

Honestly, I was not aware of this aspect, neither did I ever think that GB could play roles like these. I too, used to think most cells are spherical dur to ST, but this article now forces me to ponder if most assumptions we have for the sake of underdtanding are really scientifically existant?  I thank you sir for coming up with this article and providing us with an entirely different area of thinking.

  • Invited by the author to make a review on this article? :
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science: None
  • Publications in the same or a related area of science: No
  • References: None
 
Report abuse