Submited on: 11 Oct 2011 04:10:49 AM GMT
Published on: 11 Oct 2011 04:30:46 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Introduction:The introduction lacks clear knowledge about the subject. The importance of the study should be explained. Introduction also lacks the review of literature which is an essential part of this.

    Material and methods section: The methodology part is not clear

    Discussion: the results should be discussed and compared with studies available.

  • Competing interests:
    I declare that I have no competing interests
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:


  • How to cite:  Esmaeilzadeh M .The Gibraltar Out of Africa Exit for Anatomically Modern Humans [Review of the article 'The Gibraltar Out of Africa Exit for Anatomically Modern Humans ' by Winters C].WebmedCentral 2011;2(10):WMCRW001005
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse