Submited on: 28 Dec 2010 10:26:25 AM GMT
Published on: 29 Dec 2010 07:20:29 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    non

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Consultant Histopathologist with good experience

  • How to cite:  Baiden - Amissah K .Correlation of the expression of variousmarkers (i) Beta -HCG and P53,(ii) Beta- HCG and C-erb-b2 (iii) Beta -HCG and eGFRand (iV) C- erb-b-2 and p53 in human urothelial carcinoma[Review of the article 'Correlation Of The Expression Of Various Markers (i) Beta-HCG And P53, (ii) Beta-HCG And C-erb-b2, (iii) Beta-HCG And eGFR And (iv) C-erb-b2 And P53) In Human Urothelial Carcinomas ' by Maloney D].WebmedCentral 2011;2(10):WMCRW001007
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Relewent Pognostic Markers

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    In histopathology we routinely apply immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis and prognosis of the tumours.

  • How to cite:  Ahmed K A.asCorrelation of the expression of various markers (i) Beta- HCG AND P53, (ii) Beta -HCG AND c -ERB-B2, (iii) Beta HCG and eGFR and (iv) C-erb-b2 and p53 in Human urothelial Carcinom[Review of the article 'Correlation Of The Expression Of Various Markers (i) Beta-HCG And P53, (ii) Beta-HCG And C-erb-b2, (iii) Beta-HCG And eGFR And (iv) C-erb-b2 And P53) In Human Urothelial Carcinomas ' by Maloney D].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00559
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Consultant Radiologist
Posted by Dr. Emad Bakir on 12 Jan 2011 12:37:50 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This article is usefull in prdecting recorrence disease post treatment of urethelial tumours.

    Perhaps also a larger study and research should be encaraged to further confirm this results.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am a consultant Radiologist with interest in Urology and intervention.

    I stage and diagnose this tumour using different modalities like CT, US and MR, as well as treatment via intervention like nephrostomies, and ureteric stenting.

  • How to cite:  Bakir E .Consultant Radiologist[Review of the article 'Correlation Of The Expression Of Various Markers (i) Beta-HCG And P53, (ii) Beta-HCG And C-erb-b2, (iii) Beta-HCG And eGFR And (iv) C-erb-b2 And P53) In Human Urothelial Carcinomas ' by Maloney D].WebmedCentral 2011;2(1):WMCRW00365
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse