-
Reviews
Back to Reviews
-
Other Comments:
The submission of the presumed review article lacks significant scholarship. The diction, grammar, and language are not appropriate. There are 55 references listed but only references 30-55 are actually referred to in the manuscript. Furthermore, the abstract and the introduction are identical without any substantial explanation about the goals and reason for this article. The conclusions are insufficient and do not summarize the previous statemens. Did the authors intend to actually provide original research? If so, there is no indication in this manuscript for it - no method section, no results section.
-
Competing interests:
None.
-
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No -
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
-
References:
None -
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
I do not have experience in this specific area but have been asked to provide a general review of this submission in terms of its scientific merit.
- How to cite: Grundmann O .Review of the submission by Sharma et al. entitled "Endothelium Dysfunction, Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disorder"[Review of the article 'Endothelium Dysfunction, Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disorder ' by Thakur S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(11):WMCRW001092
No
No
None
I do not have experience in this specific area.