Submited on: 08 Dec 2011 01:42:55 PM GMT
Published on: 09 Dec 2011 06:07:53 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The article is written quite well, but minor grammatical corrections to be made. The author has to include some more references in disscuion as this topic is vague and there still exists a dilemma in management.

  • Competing interests:
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    am assistant professor in dept of oral and maxillofacial surgery where i teach the subject to the under and post  graduates

  • How to cite:  Ahmed F .Management of Plexiform Ameloblastoma in a 12 year old female: A Case Report[Review of the article 'Management of Plexiform Ameloblastoma in a 12 year old female: A Case Report ' by Badal S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(12):WMCRW001226
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
Thanks for the review Sir, i will amend the necessary changes soon.
Responded by Dr. Sheeraz Badal on 10 Dec 2011 04:29:55 PM