Submited on: 18 Oct 2011 09:04:02 AM GMT
Published on: 18 Oct 2011 12:25:50 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Minor Comments  1.'S typhi' Should be 'Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi'

           

                              2. What were the antibiotics given in the initial therapy for which there was no response ?

     

       

                              3. It would have been better to expand the Abrev TLC,DLC etc.

     

    There were no Tables or Illustrations to comment

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Experience for 32 years in Teaching and Research in Infect Dis & Clinical Microbiology.

  • How to cite:  Bodonaik N .Bodonaik NC.Enteric Fever Presenting as Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (Macrophage Activation Syndrome) Review of the Article by Bodonai NC Webmedcentral 2011;2(12)[Review of the article 'Enteric Fever Presenting as Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (Macrophage Activation Syndrome) ' by Shiekh F].WebmedCentral 2011;2(12):WMCRW001239
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    interesting piece of information 

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    13 years in field of clinical microbiology. Teaching graduate and postgraduates in field of medical microbiology since 16 years.

  • How to cite:  Saxena S .Enteric Fever Presenting as Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (Macrophage Activation Syndrome[Review of the article 'Enteric Fever Presenting as Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (Macrophage Activation Syndrome) ' by Shiekh F].WebmedCentral 2011;2(12):WMCRW001235
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The article by Dr. Shah is a valid case report, which might be useful to the medical community in the future. However, in my opinion both the scope and impact of the article are low, justifying my low score (4) for the article.

     

  • Competing interests:
    No.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    15 years of experience in microbiology, the last 4 years of which working with laboratory models of enteric fever.

  • How to cite:  Antunes L M.Enteric Fever Presenting as Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (Macrophage Activation Syndrome)[Review of the article 'Enteric Fever Presenting as Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (Macrophage Activation Syndrome) ' by Shiekh F].WebmedCentral 2011;2(10):WMCRW001040
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse