Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Yes
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
Yes
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
Yes
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
Yes
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
Yes
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
No
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
No
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
Yes
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
Yes
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
Yes
Other Comments:
Very interesting and original. Of extreme importance for MD alert.
Competing interests: No competing interest
Invited by the author to review this article? : No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
MD, infectology and tropical disease. Professor of the Dept. of Parasitology of the University of S.Paulo-Brazil. In head of the University outpatient clinic in Rondônia, Amazônia, Brazil
How to cite: Camargo L A.Critical Review on HLH[Review of the article 'Adult Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis: A 25-Year Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital ' by Masoodi Z].WebmedCentral 2011;2(12):WMCRW001248
Very interesting and original. Of extreme importance for MD alert.
No competing interest
No
No
None
MD, infectology and tropical disease. Professor of the Dept. of Parasitology of the University of S.Paulo-Brazil. In head of the University outpatient clinic in Rondônia, Amazônia, Brazil