Submited on: 17 Jan 2012 03:53:23 PM GMT
Published on: 18 Jan 2012 07:00:43 PM GMT
 
Modern Anatomy
Posted by Dr. Janja Topolovec on 20 Jan 2012 02:28:43 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The Zygote Body seems to be offering a comprehensive and in-depth approach for teaching anatomy. Although this method cannot wholly replace the prosection and dissection of the cadaver, nor the plastic models, as stated by the author, it clearly draws the attention of young medical students as one would expect considering the ever-growing science modernization.

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Dissection course participant.

  • How to cite:  Topolovec J .Modern Anatomy[Review of the article 'Zygote Body: A New Interactive 3-Dimensional Didactical Tool for Teaching Anatomy ' by Kelc R].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001408
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Interesting article on an important topic
Posted by Dr. Uros Bele on 20 Jan 2012 01:17:37 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Good research work with appropriate methodology. The topic is very up-to-date and important for anatomical education. Results of the study are nicely presented in tables. The author has also presented his views on the future development oppurtunities for Zygote Body® in the discussion. The article has numerous and recent cited literature.

  • Competing interests:
    None.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Working as an teaching assistant for anatomy.

  • How to cite:  Bele U .Interesting article on an important topic[Review of the article 'Zygote Body: A New Interactive 3-Dimensional Didactical Tool for Teaching Anatomy ' by Kelc R].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001407
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse