Submited on: 30 Nov 2011 06:26:45 AM GMT
Published on: 30 Nov 2011 09:39:51 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    the Research paper entitled ' Haemodynamics during endotoxic shock and after I/V infusion of comnbinations of NSAIDs in buffalo calevs" is very informative and orginal work, having clinical importance. This model can be raplicated in other species with suitable modifications. Depiction of data in table is quite satisfactory, however, graphic depiction would improve the rating of article.

  • Competing interests:
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    working in this/ralated area for more than 15 years

  • How to cite:  Kumar R .Haemodynamics During endotoxic shock......buffalo calves[Review of the article 'Haemodynamics During Endotoxic Shock and after I/V Infusion of a Combination of NSAIDs in Buffalo Calves ' by Bansal S].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001410
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse