Submited on: 20 Jan 2012 01:36:54 PM GMT
Published on: 21 Jan 2012 01:50:02 PM GMT
 
Advertisement to zygote body
Posted by Prof. Gamal H Hassanein on 09 Apr 2012 08:10:15 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? No
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? No
  • Other Comments:

    It seems like an advertisement to zygote body not a scientific evaluation to a new educational method..

    The manuscript needs thorough revision to remove the repeated paragraphs and to correct alphabetic mistakes e.g teaching anatomies , axilar, etc..

    The method & results must be clear and concise

     

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I have used cyber-anatomy that is comparable to zygote body 

    The course is not finshed yet , however, in my opinion this new techniques needs futher evaluation 

  • How to cite:  Hassanein G H.Advertisement to zygote body[Review of the article 'Zygote Body: A New Interactive 3-Dimensional Didactical Tool for Teaching Anatomy ' by Kelc R].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001663
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Zygote body is tend to bee seen as a new approach that will abolish the need for cadavers in teaching anatomy to medical students. However i believe it is important to understand, that nothing could substitute learning human anatomy on real cadavers. While the article praises involvement of modern virtual modelling in teaching anatomy it critically evaluates this new tool. The most importaint conclusion of the article are that Zygote Body serves as an excellent complement to traditional anatomical teaching methods, inspiring younger IT technologies involved generations to get a deeper insight. Author's research contribution on the topic is an importaint step to a wider acceptance and support of good open educational resources.

  • Competing interests:
    None
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Anatomy assistant at medical faculty

  • How to cite:  Sarenac T .A valid contribution to open educational resources[Review of the article 'Zygote Body: A New Interactive 3-Dimensional Didactical Tool for Teaching Anatomy ' by Kelc R].WebmedCentral 2012;3(2):WMCRW001504
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    A Very Good Idea, In future there will be dearth of cadavers,and this may be a good aid for teaching anatomy.

  • Competing interests:
    No.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Nil.

  • How to cite:  Perla S B.Zygote Body: A New Interactive 3-Dimensional Didactical Tool for Teaching Anatomy[Review of the article 'Zygote Body: A New Interactive 3-Dimensional Didactical Tool for Teaching Anatomy ' by Kelc R].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001440
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Modern Anatomy
Posted by Dr. Janja Topolovec on 24 Jan 2012 06:02:20 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The Zygote Body seems to be offering a comprehensive and in-depth approach for teaching anatomy. Although this method cannot wholly replace the prosection and dissection of the cadaver, nor the plastic models, as stated by the author, it clearly draws the attention of young medical students as one would expect considering the ever-growing science modernization.

  • Competing interests:
    None.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Dissection course.

  • How to cite:  Topolovec J .Modern Anatomy[Review of the article 'Zygote Body: A New Interactive 3-Dimensional Didactical Tool for Teaching Anatomy ' by Kelc R].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001423
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Interesting article on an important topic
Posted by Dr. Uros Bele on 24 Jan 2012 11:44:20 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Good research work with appropriate methodology. The topic is very up-to-date and important for anatomical education. Results of the study are nicely presented in tables. The author has also presented his views on the future development oppurtunities for Zygote Body® in the discussion. The article has numerous and recent cited literature.

  • Competing interests:
    None.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Working as a teaching assistant for anatomy.

  • How to cite:  Bele U .Interesting article on an important topic[Review of the article 'Zygote Body: A New Interactive 3-Dimensional Didactical Tool for Teaching Anatomy ' by Kelc R].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001419
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Modern Anatomy
Posted by Dr. Janja Topolovec on 20 Jan 2012 02:28:43 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The Zygote Body seems to be offering a comprehensive and in-depth approach for teaching anatomy. Although this method cannot wholly replace the prosection and dissection of the cadaver, nor the plastic models, as stated by the author, it clearly draws the attention of young medical students as one would expect considering the ever-growing science modernization.

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Dissection course participant.

  • How to cite:  Topolovec J .Modern Anatomy[Review of the article 'Zygote Body: A New Interactive 3-Dimensional Didactical Tool for Teaching Anatomy ' by Kelc R].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001408
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Interesting article on an important topic
Posted by Dr. Uros Bele on 20 Jan 2012 01:17:37 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Good research work with appropriate methodology. The topic is very up-to-date and important for anatomical education. Results of the study are nicely presented in tables. The author has also presented his views on the future development oppurtunities for Zygote Body® in the discussion. The article has numerous and recent cited literature.

  • Competing interests:
    None.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Working as an teaching assistant for anatomy.

  • How to cite:  Bele U .Interesting article on an important topic[Review of the article 'Zygote Body: A New Interactive 3-Dimensional Didactical Tool for Teaching Anatomy ' by Kelc R].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001407
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse