Submited on: 05 Jan 2012 11:55:42 AM GMT
Published on: 06 Jan 2012 02:44:10 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Very good article focusing on clinical research

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Pharmaceutical and clinical exploratory development

  • How to cite:  Gonjari I .Review on Current Trends in Clinical Research: Indian Perspective[Review of the article 'Current Trends in Clinical Research: Indian Perspective ' by Karmarkar A].WebmedCentral 2012;3(2):WMCRW001478
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Yes, the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category.

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    clinical research joining hands with IT industry is becoming largest profit making industry around the world.

  • How to cite:  Pandya S .Current Trends in Clinical Research: Indian Perspective[Review of the article 'Current Trends in Clinical Research: Indian Perspective ' by Karmarkar A].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001447
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Current Tends in Clinical Research: Indian
Posted by Dr. Abdul M Ruknudin on 20 Mar 2012 12:07:39 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? No
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The article ' Current Tends in Clinical Research: Indian Perspective' is written more like a news report rather than a research article. There is no solid data or no diagrams/figures. The authors should have provided the number of clinical trials in India, the categories based on diseases and by sponsorship, the amount of funding from overseas or by local sources etc. All this information would have made this better.

    There is a mistake not "800 billion"; it is million.

     

     

     

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I have several years of experience in research in this field and I have published several papers in international journals.

  • How to cite:  Ruknudin A M.Current Tends in Clinical Research: Indian[Review of the article 'Current Trends in Clinical Research: Indian Perspective ' by Karmarkar A].WebmedCentral 2012;3(3):WMCRW001603
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse