Submited on: 15 Feb 2012 01:09:59 PM GMT
Published on: 16 Feb 2012 10:09:23 AM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This is a highly recommended article which examines the treatment approach for replacing a missing central incisor from a mutidisciplinary approach.

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    clinical associate professor

  • How to cite:  Maloney W J.Treatment Approach for Missing Central Incisors[Review of the article 'Multidisciplinary Treatment Approach for Missing Central Incisor ' by Bhatia V].WebmedCentral 2012;3(5):WMCRW001815
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    An important concept in adult orthodontics - Implant site preparation, making the dental and periodontal health more conducive for subsequent treatment with improved long term prognosis.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Adequate

  • How to cite:  Heda P .Multidisciplinary Treatment Approach for Missing Central Incisor[Review of the article 'Multidisciplinary Treatment Approach for Missing Central Incisor ' by Bhatia V].WebmedCentral 2012;3(2):WMCRW001518
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Some images of the steps undertaken would have added to the better understanding of the readers.

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    We have tried some interdisciplinasy approach witrh the maxillary canines and been moderately to excellent success. 

  • How to cite:  Agarkar S .A good clinical approach has been suggested by the authors. [Review of the article 'Multidisciplinary Treatment Approach for Missing Central Incisor ' by Bhatia V].WebmedCentral 2012;3(2):WMCRW001507
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    There is no mention of written informed consent obtained from the patient for this case which is mandatory for any clinical procedure.

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    good

  • How to cite:  Kala S .Multidisciplinary Treatment Approach for Missing Central Incisor [Review of the article 'Multidisciplinary Treatment Approach for Missing Central Incisor ' by Bhatia V].WebmedCentral 2012;3(2):WMCRW001493
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse