Submited on: 18 Dec 2011 03:45:31 AM GMT
Published on: 18 Dec 2011 05:42:16 AM GMT
 
Review response
Posted by Dr. Oliver Grundmann on 05 Mar 2012 03:31:00 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This review article by Teong et al. provides an overview of some commonly used antibacterial agents in clinical therapy and summarizes their current use, resistance developments, and points to some specific applications that distinguish them from other antibacterial agents. The review is well written and up to date.

  • Competing interests:
    No competing interests to declare.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Teaching pharmacology and medicinal chemistry to PharmD students

  • How to cite:  Grundmann O .Review response[Review of the article 'Infectious Diarrhoea ' by Asmawi M].WebmedCentral 2012;3(3):WMCRW001554
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse