Submited on: 16 Feb 2012 10:18:26 AM GMT
Published on: 16 Feb 2012 01:02:42 PM GMT
 
Management of kalladaippu
Posted by Dr. Sonitha Sarathy on 22 Mar 2012 05:27:31 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    still more treatment modalities can be explained

    basic research paper good work

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    i have treated 8 cases of this same kind of disease

  • How to cite:  Sarathy S .Management of kalladaippu[Review of the article 'Management of Kalladaippu (Renal Calculi) ' by Natarajan S].WebmedCentral 2012;3(3):WMCRW001607
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Management on Kalladaippu
Posted by Dr. Tamilselvi Umaithanu[pillai on 22 Mar 2012 01:21:51 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    It s a basic article submitted for review further rfesearch articles are expected in this jorgan

  • Competing interests:
    These type of articles may still will b strong if also admixed with siddha basic philosophy
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I ve used those medicines in my clinic for renal calculi

  • How to cite:  Umaithanu[pillai T .Management on Kalladaippu[Review of the article 'Management of Kalladaippu (Renal Calculi) ' by Natarajan S].WebmedCentral 2012;3(3):WMCRW001605
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse