Submited on: 02 Mar 2012 09:14:50 AM GMT
Published on: 02 Mar 2012 11:20:41 AM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Good quality illustrations and images used. The paper is laid out in reasonable order. There however are several grammatical errors. Also, there is liberal use of terminology unfamiliar to english medical lexicon which I suspect occasionally makes it difficult for the reader to follow the paper.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I routinely perform this procedure.

  • How to cite:  Popuri R .Review of Percutaneous Biliary Drainage in Malignant Biliary Obstruction and Accompanying Bilomas[Review of the article 'Review of Percutaneous Biliary Drainage in Malignant Biliary Obstruction and Accompanying Bilomas ' by Kaygusuz H].WebmedCentral 2012;3(5):WMCRW001785
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Percutaneous Bilary Drainage Treatment Success
Posted by Dr. Bill Misner on 04 Apr 2012 08:00:48 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    How does anyone argue with this rate of success? The patients acute and chronic treatment by drainage is well-documented evidence including the procedure illustrations. The rate of unsuccessful attempts is also well-explained, yet low enough to support application. The language to describe this intervention is not only adequate, it is superbly explicit.

  • Competing interests:
    None
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    None. I am not a medical doctor. Nevertheless, my comments listed herein are easily supported, by reading Dr. Bilgin et al.'s brilliant manuscript.

     

    Dr. Bill Misner PhD - Emeritus

    Board-Certified Alternative Medicine Practitioner

  • How to cite:  Misner B .Percutaneous Bilary Drainage Treatment Success[Review of the article 'Review of Percutaneous Biliary Drainage in Malignant Biliary Obstruction and Accompanying Bilomas ' by Kaygusuz H].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001648
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Partly
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This article needs to be revised because of the following remarks:

    1. The article is not well structured;
    2. The ideas presented are not clear and not well explained.

    Concerning the work itself, the author tries to contribute to a well known subject.  Although the article is not correctly presented, the illustrations are a good quality ones and this contribution, not original, can be accepted just as an educational and a state-of-the-art presentation.  

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Concern just the radiology aspect

  • How to cite:  Kharfi F .Review of Percutaneous Biliary Drainage in Malignant Biliary Obstruction and Accompanying Bilomas [Review of the article 'Review of Percutaneous Biliary Drainage in Malignant Biliary Obstruction and Accompanying Bilomas ' by Kaygusuz H].WebmedCentral 2012;3(3):WMCRW001553
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Partly
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Some grammar and diction revision may be needed.

     

    This article especially emphasis the biliary drainage in malignant biliary obstruction and accompanying bilomas.

     

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    B. K. Aribas, K. Arda, F. Yakut, K. Yilmaz, K. Dogan, G. Sahin, Y. Cosar. "Percutaneous biliary drainage in malignant biliary obstruction and accompanying bilomas". Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi, 2010. 9:16-21
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Yes

  • How to cite:  Aribas B .Review of Percutaneous Biliary Drainage in[Review of the article 'Review of Percutaneous Biliary Drainage in Malignant Biliary Obstruction and Accompanying Bilomas ' by Kaygusuz H].WebmedCentral 2012;3(3):WMCRW001540
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This article has been submitted after correction because it was needed corrections. 

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Yes

  • How to cite:  Aribas B .Review of Percutaneous Biliary Drainage in Malignant Biliary Obstruction and Accompanying Bilomas[Review of the article 'Review of Percutaneous Biliary Drainage in Malignant Biliary Obstruction and Accompanying Bilomas ' by Kaygusuz H].WebmedCentral 2012;3(5):WMCRW001808
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
comments
Posted by Dr. Sandeep G Jakhere on 28 Feb 2012 04:19:24 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Partly
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The article requires major modifications as the sentences are gramatically incorrect and will definitely not appeal to an international audience . May i suggest takng help from authors expert in english language writing .

  • Competing interests:
    none
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    We are doing percutaneous biliary drainage at our institute fairly regularly and the authors findings and succes rates  are equivalent.

  • How to cite:  Jakhere S .comments[Review of the article 'Review of Percutaneous Biliary Drainage in Malignant Biliary Obstruction and Accompanying Bilomas ' by Kaygusuz H].WebmedCentral 2012;3(2):WMCRW001526
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse