WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Posted by Dr. William J Maloney on 09 Apr 2012 08:37:00 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	Yes
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	Yes
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
This is a very interesting article. The study design of performing electromyographic tests was innovative. Their conclusion is significant that among limited unilateral defects or dental arches there is a place for prosthetic treatment of the occlusion as prophylactic treatment for muscular activity.
Competing interests:
no
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

clinical associate professor
How to cite: Maloney W J.Rehabilitation of Occlusal Interferences[Review of the article 'The Impact of the Rehabilitation of Occlusal Interferences to the Activity of Masticatory Muscles ' by Hoxha A].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001668

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse

Posted by Mr. Shashi Kala on 23 Jan 2012 04:17:31 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	No
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	No
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	Yes
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	Yes
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	No
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	No
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
1.Many gramatical errors.eg;three weak.

2.Rephrase sentence likea lot of studies.

3.Reference articles are out dated,include latest studies.

4.Conclusion is not clear .In first sentence .....is significant to become is erased.
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

good
How to cite: Kala S .the impact of the rehabilitation of occlusal interferences to the activity of masticatory muscles[Review of the article 'The Impact of the Rehabilitation of Occlusal Interferences to the Activity of Masticatory Muscles ' by Hoxha A].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001416

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse