Submited on: 16 Apr 2012 06:38:18 AM GMT
Published on: 16 Apr 2012 12:43:58 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The article is fresh and original . The Title is Apppropriate. The introduction and literature search are adequate and informative .The hypothesis is clear .The Methodology is accurate.The Results are positive and the Discussion is well written and informative.Overall this work is well done and suited for publication .It will certainly create an awareness in both medical and non medical community.   

  • Competing interests:
    nil
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am a medical microbiologist with 6 years of teaching experience in medical school

  • How to cite:  D\'Souza J .Bacterial Contamination in the Kitchen:Could It Be Pathogenic?[Review of the article 'Bacterial Contamination in the Kitchen: Could It Be Pathogenic? ' by Md Nor N].WebmedCentral 2012;3(5):WMCRW001762
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    1. Some typographical and grammatical mistakes needs to corrected

    2. Discussion section should be re-named as ("RESULTS & DISCUSSION")

    3. Alignment mistakes (e.g. Klebsiellapneumoniae, presencewas etc...) needs to be addressed

    4. Paper is well written but needs some modifications

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    Prevalence Of Non-fermenters In Urinary Tract Infections In A Tertiary Care Hospital Author(s):Dr. Shobha KL, Mr. Gowrish G Rao, Mr. Anand M Kukkamalla Article ID: WMC001464
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I have undertaken several projects on MRSA, GNBs causing UTIs, Done some work on Acinetobater and am interested in Bacteriology.

  • How to cite:  K M A .Bacterial contamination in the kitchen: Could it be pathogenic?[Review of the article 'Bacterial Contamination in the Kitchen: Could It Be Pathogenic? ' by Md Nor N].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001742
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This paper demonstrates defined preventative protocols by which pathogens may be reduced in the kitchen where food is prepared. I would enjoy learning the authors' estimation of what percentage of the contamination by investing recommended applications.

  • Competing interests:
    None.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    A NOVEL ANTIMICROBIAL MOIST-TOWELETTE INHIBITS AEROBIC BACTERIA, YEAST, MOLD-FUNGUS GROWTH ON HUMAN SKIN. In press. May 2008, Townsend Letter for Doctors & Patients - The Examiner Of Medical Alternatives. Misner B. “Does the Growth Rate of Aerobic Bacterial Cells in Organic Plant Foods Reflect the Health Potential of that Food in Human Cells?” Townsend Letter for Doctors & Patients - The Examiner Of Medical Alternatives. August/September 2004: 78-80. Misner Bill. Novel Oral Compound May Inhibit Upper-Respiratory Infection, Townsend Letter October 2009.
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Performed swab-samples measure of Aerobic Bacteria proliferation count in organic plant foods and explored methods to reduce proliferation rate.

  • How to cite:  Misner B .Prevention Bacterial Contamination Kitchen Pathogenic Resolutions[Review of the article 'Bacterial Contamination in the Kitchen: Could It Be Pathogenic? ' by Md Nor N].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001696
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? No
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    It is a good study for the student project.  The conclusions drawn are somewhat little extended. 

    Reasons

    1.  It is expected for pathogens on taps, fridge handles, towels etc used in the common kitchen. (students and staff kitchen) and it is not sterile kitchen used to prepare sterile food for the seriously ill patients.

     

    2.  How can food prepared for students and staff  cause pathogenesis for immuno-compromised patients and people on mechanical ventilator who do not consume this food.

     

    3.  Have the food which is prepared is tested for bacteria (pathogenic).  May be it will not have so much bacteria and that is why you may not see such high infected cases.

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    As physiologist and scientific researcher

  • How to cite:  Satish N S.Is this contamination spread to the food which is prepared and water used for drinking[Review of the article 'Bacterial Contamination in the Kitchen: Could It Be Pathogenic? ' by Md Nor N].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001693
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    A very important study on an apparently simple matter.

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    The every day life and its problems are always in my concerns

  • How to cite:  Bedin V .Bacterial contamination in the kitchen: could it be pathogenic?[Review of the article 'Bacterial Contamination in the Kitchen: Could It Be Pathogenic? ' by Md Nor N].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001690
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse