Submited on: 12 Dec 2011 06:06:11 AM GMT
Published on: 12 Dec 2011 03:49:07 PM GMT
 
Gohil review
Posted by Lead Faculty Dr. Marie Bourgeois on 21 May 2012 12:43:13 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    interesting report

  • Competing interests:
    none
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    none

  • How to cite:  Bourgeois M .Gohil review[Review of the article 'Sanguinarine, Hydroxybutyrate Dehydrogenase and Fatigue in Epidemic Dropsy: A Retrospective Study of an Outbreak and its Control from Gujarat, India ' by Amin B].WebmedCentral 2012;3(5):WMCRW001831
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Title of the article can be changed to "Clinical profile of Epidemic dropsy patients".  Type of study has not been mentioned. A case definition could have been included. Place of estimation of HBDH and sanguinarine has not been mentioned. Authors should concentrate only on the clinical profile of epidemic dropsy patients. There are so many references at the end, however all are not used in the text.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am mainly involved in the field of Public health research. 

  • How to cite:  Verma P B.Sanguinarine, Hydroxybutyrate Dehadrogenase and Fatigue in Epidemic Dropsy: A retrospective study of a n outbreak and its control from Gujarat, India.[Review of the article 'Sanguinarine, Hydroxybutyrate Dehydrogenase and Fatigue in Epidemic Dropsy: A Retrospective Study of an Outbreak and its Control from Gujarat, India ' by Amin B].WebmedCentral 2012;3(3):WMCRW001539
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse