Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Yes
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
Yes
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
Yes
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
Yes
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
Yes
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
No
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
No
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
Yes
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
Yes
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
Yes
Other Comments:
The paper is well written. Deep vein thrombosis in tuberculosis was previously reported to be associated with retroperitoneal and para-aortic node enlargement. This was not the case in the current report. The discussion that tuberculosis itself can be hypercoagulable is valid.
Competing interests: No
Invited by the author to review this article? : No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
clinical experience and area of interest
How to cite: Lee Y .A complication of pulmonary tuberculosis to be aware of[Review of the article 'Pulmonary Tuberculosis with Deep Venous Thrombosis ' by Malik A].WebmedCentral 2013;2(9):WMCRW00916
The paper is well written. Deep vein thrombosis in tuberculosis was previously reported to be associated with retroperitoneal and para-aortic node enlargement. This was not the case in the current report. The discussion that tuberculosis itself can be hypercoagulable is valid.
No
No
No
None
clinical experience and area of interest