Home » Reviews
Inflammatory Reactive Hyperplasia of Upper Lip due to Abnormal Tooth Position: A Case Report
By Dr. Alessandra Impellizzeri , Dr. Gaspare Palaia , Prof. Umberto Romeo , Prof. Gabriella Galluccio
Submited on: 24 Dec 2013 04:26:23 PM GMT
Published on: 25 Dec 2013 05:45:08 AM GMT
 
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Laser should add somewhere in title
Posted by Anonymous Reviewer on 22 Jan 2014 01:42:10 AM GMT Reviewed by WMC Editors

  • What are the main claims of the paper and how important are they?

    Main claims: The CO2 laser demonstrated surgical effectiveness and caused little peripheral damage to the cut edges, therefore would always allow a safe histological diagnosis to be obtained. This kind of oral biopsy on the use of CO2 laser ensures the compliance of patience, the absence of bleeding and suture.

    These are very very important.


  • Are these claims novel? If not, please specify papers that weaken the claims to the originality of this one.

    Claims are good enough but need further research.


  • Are the claims properly placed in the context of the previous literature?

    No


  • Do the results support the claims? If not, what other evidence is required?

    No


  • If a protocol is provided, for example for a randomized controlled trial, are there any important deviations from it? If so, have the authors explained adequately why the deviations occurred?

    No


  • Is the methodology valid? Does the paper offer enough details of its methodology that its experiments or its analyses could be reproduced?

    Partly


  • Would any other experiments or additional information improve the paper? How much better would the paper be if this extra work was done, and how difficult would such work be to do, or to provide?

    Recurrence are there, should present nice photographs with complete cure. Present photographs bit failure type.


  • Is this paper outstanding in its discipline? (For example, would you like to see this work presented in a seminar at your hospital or university? Do you feel these results need to be incorporated in your next general lecture on the subject?) If yes, what makes it outstanding? If not, why not?

    No


  • Other Comments:

    Abstract: Aim, Introduction and title need to match.

    No need discussion here.

    Conclusion too big.

    Article part:

    Introduction - Insufficient.

    Case reports - What is UOC?

    The histological analysis of the surgical specimen confirmed the clinical diagnosis of inflammatory reactive hyperplasia: Where is histology slide???

    Discussion: Too short.

    Conclusion: Extreme long.

    References: Need to match.

    Figures: Recurrence is there.

  • Competing interests:
    None
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:

    None

  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Doing research using Laser and LIPUS.

  • How to cite:  Anonymous.Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Laser should add somewhere in title[Review of the article 'Inflammatory Reactive Hyperplasia of Upper Lip due to Abnormal Tooth Position: A Case Report ' by Galluccio G].WebmedCentral 2014;5(1):WMCRW002919
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
 
 
We use cookies on this website to measure and improve performance. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.