Submited on: 30 Sep 2010 09:49:19 PM GMT
Published on: 30 Sep 2010 09:50:24 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This article can be published. I just have few querries like why in all the cases extraction was done... like in patient of 4 years age and 5 years age also tooth were extreacted. Why not the restorative procedures performes under GA?

    Other this are satisfactory.

  • Competing interests:
    No competing interest
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Working as a lecturer in Kathmandu University school of medical sciences. Doing research in the field of oral health and Periodontology. Published some original aricles and case report in some national and international journals

  • How to cite:  Humagain M .Anaesthesia Techniques For Dental Patients With Uncommon Diseases. A Series Of Case Report.[Review of the article 'Anaesthesia techniques for dental patients with uncommon diseases. A series of case report ' by Manani G].WebmedCentral 2010;1(12):WMCRW00294
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
review of Anaesthesia techniques
Posted by Dr. Nigel D Robb on 02 Dec 2010 09:48:12 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    i think this should be published

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I run the teaching of sedation in Glasgow Dental School

  • How to cite:  Robb N D.review of Anaesthesia techniques[Review of the article 'Anaesthesia techniques for dental patients with uncommon diseases. A series of case report ' by Manani G].WebmedCentral 2010;1(12):WMCRW00189
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse