Submited on: 12 Nov 2010 03:19:31 PM GMT
Published on: 13 Nov 2010 05:39:20 PM GMT
 
Informative article
Posted by Dr. Naveen Tahasildar on 03 Jan 2011 11:03:27 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    I would like to congratulate the authors for such a valuable article.

  • Competing interests:
    None
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Good

  • How to cite:  Tahasildar N .Informative article[Review of the article 'Hypertrophic Pubic Ramus Nonunion: Does Conservative Treatment Helpful? ' by Goyal T].WebmedCentral 2011;2(1):WMCRW00322
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Review by Dr Narendra
Posted by Dr. Narendra Akkina on 31 Dec 2010 09:22:55 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Logical and informative

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Very good

  • How to cite:  Akkina N .Review by Dr Narendra[Review of the article 'Hypertrophic Pubic Ramus Nonunion: Does Conservative Treatment Helpful? ' by Goyal T].WebmedCentral 2011;1(12):WMCRW00310
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Days are gone when people used to treat every fracture conservatively. The authors of this article gave a useful massage that it is the understanding of the biomechanics of fracture that decides the mode of treatment. I congratulate them for their successful publication.   

  • Competing interests:
    nil
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Days are gone when people used to treat every fracture conservatively. The authors of this article gave a useful massage that it is the understanding of the biomechanics of fracture that decides the mode of treatment. I congratulate them for their successful publication.   

     

  • How to cite:  Agarwal A . Hypertrophic Pubic Ramus Nonunion: Does Conservative Treatment Helpful? [Review of the article 'Hypertrophic Pubic Ramus Nonunion: Does Conservative Treatment Helpful? ' by Goyal T].WebmedCentral 2011;1(11):WMCRW00150
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse