Submited on: 14 Jan 2011 01:46:24 PM GMT
Published on: 16 Jan 2011 03:39:24 AM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    well written

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    5 years

  • How to cite:  Kumar V .Functional outcome following treatment of colles fracture :A comparative study of closed reduction and plaster application versus kirschner wire fixation[Review of the article 'Functional Outcome Following Treatment Of Colles Fracture: A Comparative Study Of Closed Reduction And Plaster Cast Application Versus Kirschner Wire Fixation ' by Bali K].WebmedCentral 2011;2(1):WMCRW00377
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Excellent work. Though nothing new has been thaught, it is a very well written and well structured manuscript. I congratulate the authors for their work and the tables and figures which were very informative.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Very well versed

  • How to cite:  Mootha A K.Functional Outcome Following Treatment Of Colles Fracture: A Comparative Study Of Closed Reduction And Plaster Cast Application Versus Kirschner Wire Fixation. [Review of the article 'Functional Outcome Following Treatment Of Colles Fracture: A Comparative Study Of Closed Reduction And Plaster Cast Application Versus Kirschner Wire Fixation ' by Bali K].WebmedCentral 2011;2(1):WMCRW00373
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse