WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Posted by Dr. Utumi ER on 07 Feb 2011 11:04:48 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	No
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	No
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	No
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	No

Other Comments:
The abstract is not informative about the case presented.

There are few references and very old.
Competing interests:
None
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

Less
How to cite: ER U .Foot Drop Following Smith Peterson Approach For Greater Trochanter Osteochondroma Excision:a Case Report [Review of the article 'Foot Drop Following Smith Peterson Approach For Greater Trochanter Osteochondroma Excision:a Case Report ' by Aggarwal S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(2):WMCRW00446

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse

Interesting report

Posted by Dr. Vikas Bachhal on 30 Dec 2010 11:37:42 AM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
Interesting case report
Competing interests:
None
Invited by the author to review this article? :
Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

I have not encountered this complication with smith peterson approach till date
How to cite: Bachhal V .Interesting report[Review of the article 'Foot Drop Following Smith Peterson Approach For Greater Trochanter Osteochondroma Excision:a Case Report ' by Aggarwal S].WebmedCentral 2011;1(12):WMCRW00306

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse