WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Submited on: 17 Mar 2011 10:15:58 AM GMT

Published on: 17 Mar 2011 04:07:24 PM GMT

Posted by Mr. Govind N Purohit on 21 Mar 2011 04:30:46 AM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Partly
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	Yes
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
The Abstract does not fully cover the results

Numerical figures after a full stop should be mentioned in words

The Results presented are too lengthy. It would have been better if the results had ben summarized in the form of a table mentioning the various percentages
Competing interests:
No
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

termination of pregnancy in farm animals is entirely different from what it is in human females
How to cite: Purohit G N.Termination of Pregnancy for Mild Foetal Abnormalities: Opinions of Physicians[Review of the article 'Termination of Pregnancy for Mild Foetal Abnormalities: Opinions of Physicians ' by Herve C].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00607

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse