Submited on: 17 Mar 2011 10:03:36 AM GMT
Published on: 18 Mar 2011 02:41:18 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Partly
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    An exemplificative case of traumatic etiology for a STA aneurysm. However, why did the Authors conclude that this was a degenerative aneurysm?I would prefere to use this terminology only for atherosclerotic lesion. 

     

    I would suggest to add this reference:

    True aneurysms of the superficial temporal artery: report of three cases.

    Piffaretti G, Castelli P.

    Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Sep-Oct;23(5):687.e15-7

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    True aneurysms of the superficial temporal artery: report of three cases. Piffaretti G, Castelli P. Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Sep-Oct;23(5):687.e15-7
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Published a specific paper in 2009 on this topic

  • How to cite:  Piffaretti G .Traumatic True Aneurysm of the Superficial Temporal Artery [Review of the article 'Traumatic True Aneurysm of the Superficial Temporal Artery ' by Hocken D].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00612
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse