Submited on: 28 Sep 2010 07:28:36 PM GMT
Published on: 28 Sep 2010 08:32:37 PM GMT
article rejected
Posted by Dr. Pillebout E on 03 Apr 2011 04:45:24 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Partly
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    this paper provide nothing of interest in regard with what is already published

  • Competing interests:
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    some papers

  • How to cite:  E P .article rejected[Review of the article 'Gastrointestinal involvement revealing Henoch Schonlein Purpura in Adults: Report of Three Cases and Review of the Litterature ' by Mahjoub S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(4):WMCRW00639
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse