WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Submited on: 28 Sep 2010 07:28:36 PM GMT

Published on: 28 Sep 2010 08:32:37 PM GMT

article rejected

Posted by Dr. Pillebout E on 03 Apr 2011 04:45:24 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Partly
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	No
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	No
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	No
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	No
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	No
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
this paper provide nothing of interest in regard with what is already published
Competing interests:
no
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

some papers
How to cite: E P .article rejected[Review of the article 'Gastrointestinal involvement revealing Henoch Schonlein Purpura in Adults: Report of Three Cases and Review of the Litterature ' by Mahjoub S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(4):WMCRW00639

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse