-
Reviews
Back to Reviews
-
Other Comments:
A short and informative case report. Shame about the obvious typographical mistake in the title which mistakenly mentions corpus callosum instead of cavernosum. The experience of the reference with over 60 cases of this rare condition ought to be highlighted. Does he aggree with surgical or medical managememt and did he use ultrasonography?.
That said thepaper is good and infomative
-
Competing interests:
no competing interest
-
Invited by the author to review this article? :
Yes -
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
-
References:
None -
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
not expert in urology
- How to cite: Debrah S A.Traumatic Rupture of corpus Callosum (fracture of Penis); diagnosis based on ultrasonography -a case report[Review of the article 'Traumatic Rupture Of Corpus Cavernosum (Fracture Of Penis): Diagnosis Based Upon Ultrasonography - A Case Report ' by Desai N].WebmedCentral 2011;1(12):WMCRW00278
-
Other Comments:
The authors have done good job, & this is a well written report. However, they fail to take care of the title which is creating bad impression. Please correct the title as:
Traumatic Rupture Of Corpus Cavernosum (Fracture Of Penis): Diagnosis Based Upon Ultrasonography - A Case Report.
Note: corpus callosum is present in brain, not in penis.
-
Competing interests:
No.
-
Invited by the author to review this article? :
Yes -
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
-
References:
None -
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
Have manage 2 such cases. - How to cite: Shamim M .Traumatic Rupture Of Corpus Callosum (Fracture Of Penis): Diagnosis Based Upon Ultrasonography - A Case Report[Review of the article 'Traumatic Rupture Of Corpus Cavernosum (Fracture Of Penis): Diagnosis Based Upon Ultrasonography - A Case Report ' by Desai N].WebmedCentral 2011;1(12):WMCRW00211
good article
no
No
No
None
I have about 17 years experience in imaging