Home » Reviews
Traumatic Rupture Of Corpus Cavernosum (Fracture Of Penis): Diagnosis Based Upon Ultrasonography - A Case Report
By Dr. Anthony Venyo , Dr. Niranjan Desai
Submited on: 07 Dec 2010 02:59:40 PM GMT
Published on: 07 Dec 2010 09:29:52 PM GMT
 
traumatic rupture of corpus cavernousum
Posted by Dr. Shyamsunder R Koteyar on 28 Apr 2011 04:55:42 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

  • good article

  • Competing interests: no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? : No
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I have about 17 years experience in imaging

  • Publications in the same or a related area of science: No
  • References: None
  • How to cite:  Koteyar S R.traumatic rupture of corpus cavernousum[Review of the article 'Traumatic Rupture Of Corpus Cavernosum (Fracture Of Penis): Diagnosis Based Upon Ultrasonography - A Case Report ' by Desai N].WebmedCentral 2011;2(4):WMCRW00707
Report abuse
 
Traumatic Rupture of corpus Callosum (fracture of Penis); diagnosis based on ultrasonography -a case report
Posted by Prof. Samuel A Debrah on 23 Dec 2010 11:56:54 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

  • A short and informative case report. Shame about the obvious typographical mistake in the title which mistakenly mentions corpus callosum instead of cavernosum. The experience of the reference with over 60 cases of this rare condition ought to be highlighted. Does he aggree with surgical or medical managememt and did he use ultrasonography?.

    That said thepaper is good and infomative

     

  • Competing interests: no competing interest
  • Invited by the author to review this article? : Yes
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    not expert in urology

  • Publications in the same or a related area of science: No
  • References: None
  • How to cite:  Debrah S A.Traumatic Rupture of corpus Callosum (fracture of Penis); diagnosis based on ultrasonography -a case report[Review of the article 'Traumatic Rupture Of Corpus Cavernosum (Fracture Of Penis): Diagnosis Based Upon Ultrasonography - A Case Report ' by Desai N].WebmedCentral 2011;1(12):WMCRW00278
Report abuse
 
Traumatic Rupture Of Corpus Callosum (Fracture Of Penis): Diagnosis Based Upon Ultrasonography - A Case Report
Posted by Dr. Muhammad Shamim on 08 Dec 2010 06:26:10 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

  • The authors have done good job, & this is a well written report. However, they fail to take care of the title which is creating bad impression. Please correct the title as:

    Traumatic Rupture Of Corpus Cavernosum (Fracture Of Penis): Diagnosis Based Upon Ultrasonography - A Case Report.

    Note: corpus callosum is present in brain, not in penis.

  • Competing interests: No.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? : Yes
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science: Have manage 2 such cases.
  • Publications in the same or a related area of science: No
  • References: None
  • How to cite:  Shamim M .Traumatic Rupture Of Corpus Callosum (Fracture Of Penis): Diagnosis Based Upon Ultrasonography - A Case Report[Review of the article 'Traumatic Rupture Of Corpus Cavernosum (Fracture Of Penis): Diagnosis Based Upon Ultrasonography - A Case Report ' by Desai N].WebmedCentral 2011;1(12):WMCRW00211
Report abuse