Submited on: 30 Mar 2011 03:52:54 PM GMT
Published on: 31 Mar 2011 06:52:50 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Partly
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Interest of the case is very limited and represent only a pretext for a revue of published data on secondary NHL after Hodgkin disease. The literature is limited in this field but authord could add 

    J.Clin.Oncol. 2002 ; 20 : 2101-2108, Ng A.K et al. 

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    only on NHL in immunosuppred peolple

  • How to cite:  Choquet S .Secondary Non Hodgkinian Lymphoma in a Patient Treated for Hodgkin Disease: A Case Report with Comprehensive Literature Review[Review of the article 'Secondary Non Hodgkinian Lymphoma in a Patient Treated for Hodgkin Disease: A Case Report with Comprehensive Literature Review ' by Errihani H].WebmedCentral 2011;2(4):WMCRW00712
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse