Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Yes
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
Partly
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
No
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
No
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
Yes
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
No
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
No
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
Yes
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
Yes
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
Yes
Other Comments:
Interest of the case is very limited and represent only a pretext for a revue of published data on secondary NHL after Hodgkin disease. The literature is limited in this field but authord could add
J.Clin.Oncol. 2002 ; 20 : 2101-2108, Ng A.K et al.
Competing interests: no
Invited by the author to review this article? : Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
only on NHL in immunosuppred peolple
How to cite: Choquet S .Secondary Non Hodgkinian Lymphoma in a Patient Treated for Hodgkin Disease: A Case Report with Comprehensive Literature Review[Review of the article 'Secondary Non Hodgkinian Lymphoma in a Patient Treated for Hodgkin Disease: A Case Report with Comprehensive Literature Review ' by Errihani H].WebmedCentral 2011;2(4):WMCRW00712
Interest of the case is very limited and represent only a pretext for a revue of published data on secondary NHL after Hodgkin disease. The literature is limited in this field but authord could add
J.Clin.Oncol. 2002 ; 20 : 2101-2108, Ng A.K et al.
no
Yes
No
None
only on NHL in immunosuppred peolple