-
Reviews
Back to Reviews
-
Other Comments:
1. The style of presentation is satisfactory except for the few suggestions.
2. The scientific basis for the study is sound.
3. Main problem is the small sample size which would limit chances of obtaining any existing gender variation, significant differences, if any, between the negroid and non-negroid temporal bones in terms of basic landmarks, degree of pneumatisation and other features that could affect spread of otologic diseases and ease or otherwise of otologic surgical performance.
4. References are too crowded. Check comments on the references.
5. No keywords
Thanks for the rare privilege of being amongst your highly regarded reviewers.
Yours truly,
Dr Daniel D. Kokong
M.B;B.S, FWACS, Dipl Health Systems Management(Israel)
Consultant ENT Surgeon
-
Invited by the author to review this article? :
Yes -
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
-
References:
None -
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
None - How to cite: Kokong D D.Untitled[Review of the article 'Cadaver Temporal Bone Dissection - The JOS Experience ' by Nwaorgu G].WebmedCentral 2011;2(4):WMCRW00695
1) No keywords though asbstract appears adequate
2) Addition of anthropometry of stuctures could help racial comparisms
3) Method of harvesting/processing the temporal bone and whether they were fresh or dried would have been mentioned
none
Yes
No
None
Attendance of a Temporal Bone Dissection Course by the faculty of ORL Nat. Postgraduate Medical College of Nigeria