Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Yes
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
Yes
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
Yes
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
Yes
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
Yes
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
Yes
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
No
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
Yes
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
Yes
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
Yes
Other Comments:
The article is written well and projected software tools such as Q-site finder, Marvinsketch, OpenTox, etc.,. The students fo bioinformatics and others can adopt these tools and plan experiemnts. Under results section small correction: instead of "fitted directly" write "were fit directly". The rest is excellent.
Competing interests: no
Invited by the author to review this article? : No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: Yes
References:
If one goes through the google search > S.Krupanidhi, conservation homology among interleukins and Penicillin binding protein A, the references can be retrieved.
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
We are having the programme of DBT BIF wherein we execute insilico work related to our phyologeny experiments and docking studies.
How to cite: Sreerama K .http://www.webmedcentral.com/article_view/2120[Review of the article 'In Silico Techniques for the Identification of Novel Natural Compounds for Secreting Human Breast Milk ' by RM J].WebmedCentral 2011;2(8):WMCRW00910
The article is written well and projected software tools such as Q-site finder, Marvinsketch, OpenTox, etc.,. The students fo bioinformatics and others can adopt these tools and plan experiemnts. Under results section small correction: instead of "fitted directly" write "were fit directly". The rest is excellent.
no
No
Yes
If one goes through the google search > S.Krupanidhi, conservation homology among interleukins and Penicillin binding protein A, the references can be retrieved.
We are having the programme of DBT BIF wherein we execute insilico work related to our phyologeny experiments and docking studies.