WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Posted by Mr. Girish K Gupta on 06 Oct 2011 10:43:55 AM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Partly
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	No
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	Yes
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	No
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	No
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
The work apppeard to be quite intresting and worth publishing.

1) lot of spelling and grammatical mistakes should be revised.

2) more interpretaions or discussion should be suggested.

3) references should be uniform and correct.
Competing interests:
none
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

2yrs
How to cite: Gupta G K.Nature: Anxiolytics in the Lap of Nature [Review of the article 'Nature: Anxiolytics in the Lap of Nature ' by Shah M].WebmedCentral 2011;2(10):WMCRW00993

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse

accepted

Posted by Dr. Mohamed Ashour on 03 Sep 2011 09:23:25 AM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Partly
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	No
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	Yes
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	No
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
more discussion and explannation are needed to correlate the activity and different classes of natural products other than flavonoids
Competing interests:
no
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
Yes
References:
Genus Bupleurum: a review of its phytochemistry, pharmacology and modes of action
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

i havd published 3 original papers, one review article and one book chapter in that field
How to cite: Ashour M .accepted[Review of the article 'Nature: Anxiolytics in the Lap of Nature ' by Shah M].WebmedCentral 2011;2(9):WMCRW00919

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse