Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Yes
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
Partly
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
Yes
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
Yes
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
Yes
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
No
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
No
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
Yes
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
Yes
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
Yes
Other Comments:
It may be difficult to diagnose Necrotizing enterocolites based only on Plain X-ray's.
Competing interests: Nil
Invited by the author to review this article? : Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
have experience with Dengue Heemorhagic fever as I workas an Internist/neurologist in a large tertiary level center
How to cite: Prasad A .Necrotizing Enterocolitis with Circulatory Failure in an Adolescent with Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever: A Case Report [Review of the article 'Necrotizing Enterocolitis with Circulatory Failure in an Adolescent with Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever: A Case Report ' by Salleh H].WebmedCentral 2011;2(9):WMCRW00948
It may be difficult to diagnose Necrotizing enterocolites based only on Plain X-ray's.
Nil
Yes
No
None
have experience with Dengue Heemorhagic fever as I workas an Internist/neurologist in a large tertiary level center