Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Yes
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
Yes
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
Yes
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
Yes
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
Yes
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
No
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
No
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
Yes
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
Yes
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
Yes
Other Comments:
The author presents a fine case study of the possible maternal risk factors for NTD and DS. The findings in the study are highly suggestive of the impact altered BHMT on foliate-independent pathways for NTD and DS—this is after all—a single case study and therefore calls for more research in this area to confirm the informative findings of the author.
Competing interests: No
Invited by the author to review this article? : No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
None
How to cite: Winters C .Sound Findings on Gene Polymorphism which Demand Further research[Review of the article 'Common Gene Polymorphisms in the Mother of a Child Born with Neural Tube Defect and Down Syndrome ' by Mukherjee M].WebmedCentral 2011;2(9):WMCRW00963
The author presents a fine case study of the possible maternal risk factors for NTD and DS. The findings in the study are highly suggestive of the impact altered BHMT on foliate-independent pathways for NTD and DS—this is after all—a single case study and therefore calls for more research in this area to confirm the informative findings of the author.
No
No
No
None
None