Case Report
 

By Dr. Susheel Chaudhary , Dr. Daljit Singh , Dr. Ramesh Sen
Corresponding Author Dr. Susheel Chaudhary
Orthopaedic Surgery,Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research-Chandigarh, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research-Chandigarh, Sector-12 - India 160012
Submitting Author Dr. Susheel Chaudhary
Other Authors Dr. Daljit Singh
Department of Orthopaedics,, Department of Orthopaedics,Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research,nSector-12, Chandigarh, India.n - India 160012

Dr. Ramesh Sen
Department of Orthopaedics,, Department of Orthopaedics,Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research,nSector-12, Chandigarh, India.n - India 160012

ORTHOPAEDICS

Chondrosarcoma; distal radius.

Chaudhary S, Singh D, Sen R. Chondrosarcoma Of Distal Radius- A Case Report And Brief Review Of Literature. WebmedCentral ORTHOPAEDICS 2010;1(12):WMC001274
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2010.001274
No
Submitted on: 03 Dec 2010 02:12:01 AM GMT
Published on: 03 Dec 2010 05:55:38 PM GMT

Abstract


A 55 years old patient male presented with progressively enlarging, painful swelling over right wrist. Excision biopsy showed well differentiated chondrosarcoma of distal radius, which is rare and less reported at this location. Excision of the tumour was done with no recurrence detected at the latest follow up of two years.

Introduction


Chondrosarcoma constitutes about 10% of primary malignant bone tumour of bone with peak incidence in fifth and sixth decade of life1. It can occur in any location; however, most are located in the trunk, pelvis and proximal portions of femur and humerus1, 2. Rarely can it occur in small bones of hand and feet with high malignant potential3. To the best of our knowledge, there is no case reported in the literature regarding chondrosarcoma of distal radius in human beings. We are presenting a case report of 55 years old male with chondrosarcoma of distal radius and a brief review of literature.

Case Report(s)


A 55 years old male presented to our institute with complaint of painful, progressively enlarging swelling over the right wrist for the last five years. There was no significant history of trauma to the affected limb.

On examination there were two swellings - one was about 6 cm × 5 cm in size on dorsally and the other smaller one was about 3cm× 2cm on palmar aspect and laterally. The overlying skin was normal and freely mobile. The swelling was irregular in shape and hard on palpation (Fig. 1). The range of movement was limited both in palmar flexion as well as dorsiflexion. There was no regional lymphadenopathy in affected limb. At first thought we kept the possibility of ganglion, rheumatoid arthritis or gout as the radiograph was not done, though there was no history suggestive of rheumatoid arthritis and gout.

Radiograph was done that showed fluffy calcification over wrist, dorsally and on lateral and palmar aspect and a destructive lesion over radial styloid process (Fig. 2a and 2b).  Haematological and biochemical investigation revealed no abnormality. As the case was discussed with other faculty members, we kept the rare possibility of primary chondrosarcoma arising carpal bones or secondary chondrosarcoma arising from pre-existing osteochondroma though there was no history of any swelling over the wrist before this swelling appeared. There was no history of Maffuci syndrome or Ollier’s disease. After discussion we planned for excisional biopsy. A 10 cm dorsal midline incision was given extending from lower third forearm to dorsum of the hand. The extensor retinaculum was incised. The swelling was not adherent to the surrounding soft tissue. It was irregular in shape with white and bluish hue (Fig. 3). There was destruction of the radial styloid process (Fig.4). The capsule of wrist joint was excised and all the tumor tissue was removed along with styloid process of radius which was sent for histopathological examination. There was no involvement of carpal bones. Wound was closed and post operative above elbow plaster slab was applied. Sutures were removed on 14th postoperative day and plaster slab was removed at three weeks and wrist movements started.

Histopathology report showed features of well differentiated chondrosarcoma. Tumour cells were arranged in lobules with lacunae in them containing multiple cells. There was increased cellularity and tumour cells showed moderate pleomorphism. Tumour was infiltrating the soft tissue. (Fig. 5a,b&c)

No further surgery was planned for patient. Patient was examined at regular interval and there was no recurrence at local site till the latest follow up at two years.

Whole body PET CT scan was done at two years by injecting 370 MBq of F18-FDG using a dedicated BGO PET-CT scanner. The scan showed no abnormal FGD uptake in radius on right side. Non FDG avid mass with irregular calcification is seen on the ulnar side of the wrist on the right side.There was no local recurrence and distance metastasis. The functional outcome and range of movement were good.

Discussion


Chondrosarcoma is a malignant tumour of proliferating cartilage tissue4. It may arise as a primary lesion, or it may occur secondarily at the site of a previous benign lesion such as an osteochondroma or enchondroma5,6. More than 75% are primary tumours. Primary chondrosarcoma occurs between 40-60 years of age and secondary chondrosarcoma have peak between 25-45 years1.

Chondrosarcoma can occur in any location, skeletally and extra skeletally. Most common skeletal locations are the pelvis, proximal femur, and proximal humerus1, 2. Although chondrosarcoma rarely occur in the hand, they are the most common malignancy of bone in this location. Chondrosarcomas of the bones of the hands and feet are rare and can be difficult to differentiate from enchondromas. In hand, chondrosarcomas are noted in phalanges, metacarpals, trapezium and trapezoid3, 7. These can be mistaken for ganglion, gout, bursa, rheumatoid arthritis or a nail abnormality overlying a cyst7.

There is no case reported in literature regarding the location of chondrosarcoma at distal radius although there are few veterinary studies that have shown the presence of chondrosarcoma in animals at this site8, 9. The diagnosis of chondrosarcoma at this site can pose problems to clinicians and pathologists.

Histologically, various types of chondrosarcoma include - conventional chondrosarcoma, dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma, clear cell chondrosarcoma and mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. Conventional chondrosarcoma are composed of malignant cells with abundant cartilaginous matrix10, 11. Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma consist of a high-grade sarcoma adjacent to an otherwise typical low-grade chondrosarcoma11, 12. Clear cell chondrosarcoma is a low grade malignancy, consist of round cell with abundant clear cytoplasm and distinct cytoplasmic borders with a background of cartilaginous matrix11, 13. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma is a high-grade tumour consisting of small round blue cells with islands of benign appearing cartilage10, 11, 14. Tumour biopsy from our patient showed a well differentiated conventional chondrosarcoma with tumour cells arranged in lobules and lacunae in them containing multiple cells.

Radiologically, Chondrosarcoma shows “punctate” or “popcorn” calcification with bone destruction, cortical erosions, periosteal reaction, and rarely a soft-tissue mass15. Radiograph on our patient showed  typical calcification in radiograph of wrist.

Regarding the treatment of chondrosarcoma, chemotherapy and radiotherapy has limited role. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of therapy for chondrosarcoma16, 17. The treatment of low-grade chondrosarcoma is controversial with many authors reporting excellent results after extended curettage with use of intraoperative adjuvant treatments. The treatment of high-grade chondrosarcoma is wide or radical resection or amputation11. Chondrosarcoma in our case was a low grade well differentiated. Excision of the tumour yielded good result with no recurrence at two years of follow up.

Prognosis of the chondrosarcoma depends on many factors like size, grade, and location of lesion. A 10-year survival rate of 77% for grade 1, 59% for grade 2, and 36% for grade 3 lesions was documented in one study2. The five years survival rate is less than 15% for patient with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma18.  Our patient needs a regular follow up to look for any local recurrence in future.

Conclusion


We presented a rare case of chondrosarcoma of distal radius. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reported in literature regarding this rare location of chondrosarcoma.

References


1.Gitelis S, Bertoni F, Picci P, Campanacci M. Chondrosarcoma of Bone: The Experience at the Instituto Orthopedico Rizzoli. J Bone Joint Surg 1981;63A:1248.
2.Pritchard DJ, Lunke RJ, Taylor WF, et al. Chondrosarcoma: A Clinicopathologic and Statistical Analysis. Cancer 1980;45:149.
3.Ogose A, Unni KK, Swee RG, et al:  Chondrosarcoma of the small bones of the hands and feet.   Cancer   1997; 80:50-9.
4.Huvos AG. Bone Tumors: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prognosis, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1991.
5.Garrison R, Unni K, McLeod R, et al. Chondrosarcoma Arising in Osteochondroma. Cancer 1982;49:1890-97.
6.Nelson DL, Abdul-Karim FW, Carter JR, Makley JT. Chondrosarcoma of Small Bones of the Hand Arising from Enchondroma. J Hand Surg 1990;15A:655-59.
7.Patil S, de Silva MJ, Crossan J, et al: Chondrosarcoma of the small bones of the hand.   J Hand Surg   2003; 28B:602-8.
8.Bertone AL, Powers BE, Turner AS. Chondrosarcoma in the radius of a horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1984 Sep 1;185(5):534-7.
9.Boudrieau RJ, Schelling SH, Pisanelli ER. Chondrosarcoma of the radius with distant metastasis in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1994 Aug 15;205(4):580-3.
10.Forest M, Tomeno B, Vanel D, ed.  Orthopaedic surgical pathology: diagnosis of tumours and pseudotumoral lesions of bones and joints,   Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1998.
11.Robert K, Heck Jr. Malignant tumours of bone. In: Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics. Mosby; 2008: 901-39.
12.Capanna R, Bertoni F, Bettelli G, et al:  Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma.   J Bone Joint Surg   1988; 70A:60-9.
13.Kaim AH, Hugli R, Bonel HM, et al:  Chondroblastoma and clear cell chondrosarcoma: radiological and MRI characteristics with histopathological correlation.   Skeletal Radiol   2002; 31:88.
14.Harwood AR, Krajbich JI, Fornasier VL:  Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: a report of 17 cases.   Clin Orthop Relat Res   1981; 158:144.
15. Weiner SD:  Enchondroma and chondrosarcoma of bone: clinical, radiologic, and histologic differentiation.   Instr Course Lect   2004; 53:645.
16.Bjornsson J, Unni K, McLeod RA, et al. Primary Chondrosarcoma of Long Bones and Limb Girdles. Cancer 1998;83:2105-19.
17.Marcove RC. Chondrosarcoma: diagnosis and treatment. Orthop Clin North Am 1977; 8(4):811–20.
18.Frassica FJ, Unni KK, Beabout JW, Sim FH. Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma: A Report of the Clinicopathologic Features and Treatment in Seventy-Eight Cases. J Bone Joint Surg 1986; 68-A:1197-1205.

Source(s) of Funding


The authors declare that they didnot got any funding for our article.

Competing Interests


The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer


This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

Reviews
0 reviews posted so far

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)