Research articles
 

By Ms. Vaishnavi Ansingkar , Dr. Nikhilesh Kulkarni
Corresponding Author Ms. Vaishnavi Ansingkar
Microbiology Research Lab R. A. College , Civil lines Washim - India
Submitting Author Ms. Vaishnavi M Ansingkar
Other Authors Dr. Nikhilesh Kulkarni
R.A. College, Washim., Department of microbiology, R.A. College, Washim. - India

MICROBIOLOGY

Endophyte, Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli O157:H7, Fresh produce

Ansingkar V, Kulkarni N. Incidences Of Endophytic Human Pathogens In Fresh Produce. WebmedCentral MICROBIOLOGY 2010;1(12):WMC001299
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2010.001299
No
Submitted on: 08 Dec 2010 12:28:56 PM GMT
Published on: 10 Dec 2010 07:38:14 PM GMT

Abstract


The frequency of documented outbreaks of human illness associated with consumption of consumption of raw fruits and vegetables has increased in recent years. In present study 10 different fresh produce were proceed for standard plate count to evaluate the existence of endophytic bacterial human pathogens. This study revealed that out of the tested samples 60% were found to be contaminated with Salmonella spp. While 50% were loaded with endophytic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Maximum contamination was observed in leafy vegetables like spinach and coriander. While in Carrot, onion and radish pathogens was not observed. The potential internalization of pathogens in fresh produce is a concern of food safety and enlight the chances of epidemic outbreaks.

Key Words:  Endophyte, Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli O157:H7, Fresh produce.

Introduction


The epidemiology of food borne diseases is rapidly changing. The proportion of food borne illness associated with fresh produce has increased over last decade. Factors influencing this raid occurrence include change in agronomic practices, dietary habitats etc.[1]. Vegetables and fruits are frequently identified as the potential source of infection. In farm to table production there are various possible points of contamination of salad vegetables and fruits with disease causing microbes viz. poor quality irrigation water, manure, handling by workers etc. [2]. Regardless the source of contamination in field, the pathogens finds a way to survive and reproduce on the surface of fresh produce and even worse, inside the plant tissues and exist as an endophyte. They find safe environment to survive and cannot be washed off or killed by disinfectants. Therefore, in an effort to address this concern, the present work has been carried out to evaluate the microbiological quality of vegetables with special reference to endophytic bacterial pathogens viz. Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Methods


The vegetables viz. brinjal, carrot, cauliflower, chili, coriander, lady finger, onion, radish, ridge gourd and spinach were taken as sample vegetables and proceed for surface sterilization, which was carried out using 70% alcohol and 50C chilled water [3]. These surface sterilized produce samples were chopped aseptically into small pieces and washed with sterile distilled water. This wash water was further used to evaluate the existence of endophytic bacterial pathogens.

Enumeration of endophytic salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli O157:H7 was carried out adopting standard plate count method using selective media viz. Bismuth sulphite agar and sorbitol Macconkey agar respectively. The colonies developed on the media were detected by examining the colony, morphological and biochemical characters [4].

Results and Discussion


The frequency of documented outbreaks of human illness associated with consumption of consumption of raw fruits and vegetables [5] has increased in recent years. Therefore the target commodities selected for this research include the produce items which are mostly consumed raw or in minimally processed form.

In the present investigation, endophytic bacterial pathogens viz. salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli O157:H7 were found to be present in different in different vegetable samples as shown in (illustration1, 2). Bacterial attachment and infiltration do occur and are facilitated by stomata, lenticels, broken trichomes and bruises and cracks in the skin surface of fruits and vegetables [6, 7].

In case of radish, carrot and onion our results are in accordance with Natvig et al.,[8] and Islam et al.,[9] who showed that no pathogens detected by enrichment on radish and carrot at harvest whereas Auty et al.,[10] showed internalization of the Escherichia coli O157:H7 in carrots where pathogen cells were found mainly at the cell junctions and in intracellular spaces up to 50μm.

In this study, other produce samples viz. brinjal, cauliflower, chili, lady finger and ridge gourd     were found to be contaminated with endophytic human pathogens. The leafy vegetables like coriander and spinach were found to be heavily loaded with pathogens. Franz et al., [11]also found significant population of both S. enterica serovar typhimurium and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in sterilized leaf samples from plants grown in contaminated soil. The common site of entry of conjectured to be penetration at cracks in seed coat [12] or invasion at lateral root junction in seedling [13, 14, 15]. Exudation of nutrients at these entry sites is hypothesized to act as the trigger for mobilization of pathogens to these sites [13 14, 16] although adhesive characteristics and colonization ability [14] also factor into their proliferation near these sites. Subsequent entry into the tissue is appearing to be depend on the type of the plant [17].

The present study showed that out of 10 tested produce samples 60% and 50% were found to be contaminated with Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli O157:H7 respectively. Thus the potential internalization of pathogens in fresh produce is a concern of food safety.

Conclusion


The study revealed the ability of enteropathogen to survive as an endophyte. This may possibly bring the mass contamination of vegetables produce with human enteropathogens and hence enlight the chances of epidemic outbreaks especially in the areas having the unhygienic cultivation system. Hence it is needed to prevent or minimize the contact of human pathogens during the cultivation and processing of fresh produce, so as to avoid it as an occulant source of human infection

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to Rajastan education society, R. A. college Washim for providing lab facilities and encouragement during the study period.

Source funding

None

References


1. Altekruse SF,Cohen ML, Swerdlow DL. Emerging food borne diseases. Emerg. Infect. Dis.(1997);3:285-293
2. Buchat LR, Ryu JH. Produce hansling and processing practices. Emerg. Infect. Dis.(1997);3: 439-465
3. Machado DC, Maia CM, Carvalho ID, Desilva NF,. BorgesAndre MC, Serafini Ab. Microbiological quality of organic vegetables produced in soil treated with different tyes of manure and mineral fertilizers. Brazil J. Microbiol.(2006);37:538-544.
4. Sneath peter HA. Bergey’s manule of systemic bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins (1994); 2: 1104-1207, 1261-1418.
5. Dereever C. Microbiological safety evaluations and recommendations n fresh produce. Food control (1998); 9 :321-347.
6. Dingman DW.Growth of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Brushed apple (Malus Domestica) tissue as influenced by cultivar, date of harvest and source. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.(2000); 66: 1077-1083.
7. Wells JM, Butterfield JE. Salmonella contamination associated with bacterial soft rot of fresh fruits and vegetables in the marketplace. Plant Dis. 91997); 81:867-872.
8. Natvig EE,Ingham SC,Inghm BH, Cooperband LR, Roper TR. Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium  and Escherichia coli contamination of root and leaf vegetables grown in soils with incorporated bovine manure. Appl. Environ, Microbiol. (2002); 2737-2744.
9. Islam M, Michaei P, doyles SC, Pathak, Millner P, Jiang X. Survival of Escherichia coli  O157: H7 in soil and on carrots and onion grown in fields treated with contaminated manure compost or irrigation water. Food Microbiol. (2005); 63-70.10.
10.  Auty M, Duffy G, O’Beirne D, McGovern A, Gleeson E, Jordan K. In situ localization of Escherichia coli  O157:H7 in food by confocal scanning laser microscopy. J. Food Prot.(2005);68: 482-486.
11.  Franz E, Visser AA, VAnDiepeninggen AD, Klerks MM, Termorshuizen AJ, VanBruggen AHC. Quantification of contamination of lettuce by GFP expressing Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium. Food Microbiol. (2007); 24: 106-112.
12. Wachtel MR, Whiteland LC, Mandrill RE. Association of Escherichia coli O157:H7 with preharvest leaf lettuce upon ensure to contaminated irrigation water. J. FoodProt. (2002); 65: 18-25.
13. Cooley MB, Miller WG,Mandrill RE. Colonization of Arabidopsis thaliana with Salmonella enterica and entero hemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 and competition by Enterobactor asbyriae. Appl. Environ. Micribiol. (2003); 69:4915-4926
14. Dong Y, Iniguez AL, Triplett EW. Quantitative assessment of the host range and strain specificity of endophytic colonization by Klebsialla pneumoniae 342. Plant soil (2003); 257: 49-59.
15. Warriner K, Spaniolas S, Dickinson M, Wright C, Waites WM. Internalization of bioluminescent Escherichia coli and Salmonella  Montevideo in growing bean sprouts. J. Appl. Microbiol.(2003); 95: 719-727.
16. Jablasone J, warriner K, Griffines M. Interactions of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella typhimurium and Listeria monocytogens plants cultivated in a genobiotic system. J. Food Microbiol.(2005); 99: 7-18.
17. Solomon EB, Matthews KR. Use of Fluorescent microspheres as a tool to investigate bacterial interactions with growing plants. J. Food Prot. (2005); 68:870-873.

Source(s) of Funding


none

Competing Interests


Bacteriology

Disclaimer


This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

Reviews
6 reviews posted so far

Review of Ansingkar and Kulkarni
Posted by Dr. Birgit Pruess on 22 Dec 2010 05:02:35 PM GMT

Endophytic Human Pathogens
Posted by Mr. Suchir Arora on 12 Dec 2010 12:14:19 PM GMT

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)