Introduction
Nasogastric intubation is the placement of a marked tube into the stomach through the nose or mouth.
This is an usually Intensive Care Unit (ICU) personnel procedure with the following purposes:
-to drainage and analyse stomach’s contents
-continuous drainage
-to decompress the gastrointestinal tract
-to administer drugs and other oral agents
-for diagnostic reasons
-for continuous feeding [1]
To ensure proper placement performing the whoosh test is recommended (though not unequivocally confirmed). The “whoosh test” is the air injection trough the tube, if the air is heard in the stomach with a stethoscope, we assume the tube is in the correct position. Gurgling is heard when air enters the stomach, whilst its absence suggests the tip of the NGT is elsewhere (lung, esophagus, pharynx, and so on) [2].
Case Report(s)
A female, 55 years old, was at home when a cerebral bleeding occur. She arrives by ambulance at the Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia (a 900-bed University Urban Hospital), in the Emergency Department. She breathes from the Venti-mask with 100% flow rate and sats 100% SO2, 100 bfm CF, ABP 160/100. The neurological test is G.C.S. 6 (E1; V1; M4), anysocoria right-to-left. The team places a bladder catheter, tracheal tube (OTT - Murphy n° 7), a Poly Vinyl Chlorur (PVC) NGT (Levin’s tube 16 FG). The cerebral CT showing an intraparenchimal bleeding so the patient is addressed in ICU.
Discussion
In ICU, the Central Venous Catheter is indwelled in the right internal jugular vein, it is necessary the CXR test to confirm the correct placement of the OTT and CVC but the NGT is maybe folded up in a loop at D7 level[Fig.1]. .
There’s no evidences about the use of the “whoosh test” to assess the correct placement of the NGT as unique technique; in this patient actually the NGT wrong position it was proved by chance.
The gold standard test to value the right procedure it’s the CXR. Weak points are the high costs, the timing between the NGT placement and the X-Ray test results, the X-Ray exposure.
Another more reliable method is to aspirate some fluid from the tube; this fluid is then tested with pH paper to determine the acidity of the fluid. If the pH is 5.5 or below then the tube is in the correct position. Is possible to verify with this test at the bed of the patient and it is a very cheap procedure but the results maybe can be inaccurate due to anti-acid drugs, Proton pump inhibitors and a disphagy problem[3].
Moreover, the right placement of the NGT can be confirmed by using capnometry and sonography. The first one requires thesampling tube of the capnograph be attached to the open endof the nasogastric tube and obtain an end-tidal carbon dioxidewave form. Sonography, consists an ultrasound-based diagnostic imaging technique by use of a specialty transducer on the surface of the abdomen[4]. These tests (in alternative for “whoosh test” and X-Ray test) required a well trained staff and sometimes not much reliable because it’s up to the operator ability.
We need to find another reliable method like CXR test in case of accidental removal of the device that requires to perform the placement of a NGT even several times a week (i.e. in case of ICU delirium)[5]. Further studies can show which is the correct practice to perform at bedside and with the best relate cost-result.
Abbreviations(s)
ICU = intensive care unit; CXR = chest radiograph; NGT = nasogastric tube; OTT = orotracheal tube
References
1. Elpern EH, Killeen K, Talla E, Perez G, Gurka D (2007) Capnometry and air insufflation for assessing initial placement of gastric tubes Am J Crit Care 16:544-549;
2. Dawson J (2007) Nasogastric tube incidents and the use of the 'whoosh test' Crit Care 11: 419.
3. Peter S, Gill F (2009) Development of a clinical practice guideline for testing nasogastric tube placement J Spec Pediatr Nurs 14:3-11.
4. Vigneau C, Baudel JL, Guidet B, Offenstadt G, Maury E (2005) Sonography as an alternative to radiography for nasogastric feeding tube location. Intensive Care Med 31:1570-1572.
5. Carrión MI, Ayuso D, Marcos M, Paz Robles M, De la Cal MA, Alía I, Esteban A (2000) Accidental removal of endotracheal and nasogastric tubes and intravascular catheters Crit Care Med 28:63-66.
Source(s) of Funding
Not assisted any financial support
Competing Interests
No Competiting interests among authors
Disclaimer
This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer
review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is
completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript
but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before
submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also
ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred
the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to
the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor
replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the
WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm
that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.