Original Articles

By Dr. Simon B Thompson
Corresponding Author Dr. Simon B Thompson
Psychology Research Centre , Bournemouth University, - United Kingdom BH12 5BB
Submitting Author Dr. Simon B Thompson

Clinical Practice, Clinician, Neurology, Neuropsychology, Patients, Physiology

Thompson SB. Improving Clinical Practice in Neurology. WebmedCentral NEUROLOGY 2012;3(1):WMC002858
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2012.002858

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Submitted on: 05 Jan 2012 04:39:59 PM GMT
Published on: 06 Jan 2012 02:45:26 PM GMT


Neurology and neuropsychology is complex because it considers the intricate nature of human architecture as well as physiology and neurological pathways. Exploring ways of improving clinical practice in these areas is always welcomed; often experience of working in different cultures and in different financially dependent organisations provides valuable insight into how improvements may be made to the delivery of best clinical practice.


I was delighted to be invited recently to Paris to exchange ideas and to forge research collaborations in Alzheimer’s disease.My visit to Université Nanterre Ouest La Défense, Paris, France, supported by the British Council Erasmus Travel Scholarship scheme, and to local French hospitals enabled me to make valuable links into this important area of research.
My meetings with French colleagues gave me an understanding of the obstacles they faced in treating patients compared with our own in the British National Health Service (NHS). I met researchers who have developed a computerised package for helping carers of people with Alzheimer’s disease.It is hoped this will assist them to gain essential information about services, medication, and support and possibly alleviate some of the burden they experience in caring for a family member with the disease.
I am working on a similar system in Britain to be rolled out to carers and assistants in the NHS and community settings.This will complement my research and teaching at Bournemouth University.
In exchange, I was invited to give a lecture and seminar, in French, to the prestigious University Professors and post graduate students. Thankfully, my school French did not have to be stretched too far when the questions after my lecture were asked mainly in English! The French hospitality was typically generous and welcoming. Though, I did not fully grasp drinking very strong black coffee throughout the day without getting hydrated and frequently visiting la toilette.
Improving clinical practice
It is well known that our European partners operate their schedules on different time zones. I arrived far too early for my lecture and then waited nearly an hour for everyone to become seated. The Director of School cordially invited me in proper manner in native French but seemed to talk for an eternity before I could either recognise my name or the subject matter which I had rehearsed and become familiar with in French and English.
I think my first two minutes of unusually placed French nouns in elementary sentences may have gone unnoticed because of the vibrating microphone that worked inconsistently after it was handed to me by the Director of School.
A fleeting image flashed before me of a stand-up karaoke and then of a London market stall trader momentarily shouting out his wares, as the microphone snapped on and off. But it made me take a step back from the whole affair with a little light-heartedness and allowed me to relax and deliver the two-hour lecture with some enjoyment.
I have certainly developed a better understanding of cultural differences and, importantly, of health services and academia. Funding is probably as hard to obtain in the French health care system as it is in Britain, but funds do seem to be larger; and in the University, classes of students are bigger. The policy of liberté, égalite, fraternité is taken seriously with students gaining places onto psychology courses and remaining in study for up to five years before a decision is made with respect to their academic standard and whether or not they should graduate. Studying is hard in France when you have to remain motivated right up to your last year before knowing if you will gain any qualifications at all.
Certainly, this experience has been right for me and is at the right time in my career. I have many years’ experience in the NHS as Consultant, and in academia as Associate Professor and Visiting Professor. But it has been a joy to meet students and staff at all levels to gain an insight into studying in a culturally different country.
Despite being in egalitarian Europe, you know you have entered another country when the electric pylons start to look different - strikingly star-shaped in the field alongside the Eurostar train track. The welcoming pink tiled roofs and old-fashioned 18th and 19th century apartments just reinforce French-ness and evoke excitement of being somewhere different. The Parisienne quartiers give way to 1960s concrete and graffiti as you travel towards the well-worn North-western edge of the city, by-passing the new state-of-the art architectural edifices of La Défense and reaching the huge campus that is Université Nanterre Ouest La Défense.
I did wonder by what means of transport President Sarkozy commuted to the University when he studied law at the prestigious Law Building. I doubted that he had the means or at his disposal the black limos and helicopters in those days.
One member of staff commented that the building was the only right-wing part of the campus though I remembered that part of being an ambassador from another country is never to get involved in another country’s politics! So I commented on the intriguing architectural viewpoint which served as a successful diversion; and also outlined the merits of having two psychologically different University departments on campus – one firmly seated in cognitive and experimental psychology, and the other which unusually saluted the old traditions of psychoanalysis.


I am most grateful to the Psychology Departments of Université Nanterre Ouest La Défense, Paris, France, and the support of the British Council Erasmus Travel Scholarship scheme. I am also grateful to the welcome of staff at L’hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.

Source(s) of Funding


Competing Interests



This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

4 reviews posted so far

Improving clinical practice in neurology
Posted by Ms. Holly Chinnery on 08 Jan 2012 04:38:21 PM GMT

Improving clinical practice in neurology - review
Posted by Ms. Natalie Jones on 08 Jan 2012 12:32:22 PM GMT

Is it a scientific article?
Posted by Prof. Prasunpriya Nayak on 07 Jan 2012 01:34:55 PM GMT

Inproving Clinical Practice in Neurology
Posted by Mr. Brian Thompson on 06 Jan 2012 06:36:59 PM GMT

1 comment posted so far

improving clinical practice in neurology Posted by Prof. Jayendra R Gohil on 14 Jan 2012 02:40:31 PM GMT

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.


Author Comments
0 comments posted so far


What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)