Case Report
 

By Dr. Amam Mohamed , Dr. Rahmani Mohammed
Corresponding Author Dr. Amam Mohamed
Urologie , - Morocco
Submitting Author Dr. Amam Mohamed
UROLOGY

Pyonephrosis, Nephrostomy, Kidney Infection

Mohamed A, Mohammed R. Management of Pyonephrosis: Our Experience. WebmedCentral UROLOGY 2012;3(5):WMC003420

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Submitted on: 27 May 2012 01:07:32 PM GMT
Published on: 28 May 2012 12:24:11 PM GMT

Introduction


The pyonephrosis is a suppurative process of the urinary tract and kidney leading to a rapid and complete loss of kidney function. The classical treatment of a pyonephrosis is a drainage by nephrostomy. It is usually followed by nephrectomy as a secondary procedure or less commonly by a reconstructive operation. We report 19 cases of pyonephrosis treated in our service.

Case Report


Over a period of three years (January 2009-January 2012) were treated in our training 19 cases of pyonephrosis (12 women and 7 men). Their average age was 43 years (23 years to 74 years). Clinically, all patients presented with fever, lower back pain and a significant deterioration in general health. Biologically, they all had an important inflammatory syndrome. The Radiological examinations (radiography, ultrasound and scanner) have objectified obstructive lithiasis in 16 patients, an ureteropelvic junction syndrome in 2 patients and an ureteral stenosis secondary to pelvic surgery in one patient.we proceeded with the establishment of a percutaneous nephrostomy in 15 patients and an ureteral catheter in 4 patients. A large-spectrum antibiotics was initiated with a clinical and laboratory monitoring a first group of 8 patients underwent an early nephrectomy (average 10 days after admission) because of persistent sepsis (5 cases) and due to a complete destruction of the kidney to the scanner (3 cases). A second group of 11 patients underwent a re-evaluation after 3 months (renal scintigraphy) and we conducted a nephrectomy in 8 patients and a conservative surgery in 3 patients (2 surgery for nephrolithiasis and one treatment for ureteropelvic junction syndrome) in the first group the mean hospital stay was 17 days, the mean operative time was 1 hour 50 minutes and we got 4 peroperative complications (one wound digestive, three openings peritoneal and one pleural wound). One patient died postoperatively due to septic shock on the second group, the average hospital stay was 9 days with a mean surgery time of 1 hour 10 minutes. One peroperative complication was noted (peritoneal opening).

Discussion


The pyonephrosis is an emergency requiring renal drainage and antibiotic therapy rigorous. The indication of emergency surgery is persistent sepsis or the presence of complications (rupture of pyonephrosis, for example). The remote surgery of renal drainage is easier, with a lower mortality and morbidity, what we explain by a reduced inflamatory and infectious phenomana (thanks to a long period drainage).It allows a conservative surgery (3 in our series) if the kidney is functional.

Conclusion


The management of pyonephrosis is an emergency, it usually leads to nephrectomy. The surgery is difficult with an early mortality and morbidity. The remote surgery is easier and can sometimes preserve the kidney if he is functional.

References


1. SAW Y. FALL B. SARR A. Pyonéphrose: 44 observations au Sénegal; Médecine tropicale 2011, Vol.71,no5, 495-498
2. RABII R. JOUAL A. RAIS H. FEKAK H. MOUFID K.; Pyonéphrose: diagnostic et traitement : à propos de 14 cas ; Annales d'urologie 2000, vol. 34, no3, pp. 161-164
3. G S M HARRISON F; The management of pyonephrosis; Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England (1983) vol.65

Source(s) of Funding


None

Competing Interests


None

Disclaimer


This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

Reviews
2 reviews posted so far

Pyonephrosis - A Review
Posted by Faculty Mr. Krishna Kumar Govindarajan on 25 Jun 2012 05:10:54 AM GMT

Reading that manuscript was a great loss to time
Posted by Faculty Dr. Ahmed F Kotb on 02 Jun 2012 01:33:01 PM GMT

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and Faculty members can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + Faculty Ratings)