Case Report
 

By Dr. Anil Salgia , Dr. Faiyaz Khan , Dr. (col.) Samar K Biswas , Dr. Rohit Malhotra
Corresponding Author Dr. Faiyaz Khan
Department of Orthopaedics, Padmashree Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, 7, Acre Road - India 700017
Submitting Author Dr. Faiyaz Khan
Other Authors Dr. Anil Salgia
Department of orthopaedics, Padmashree Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, , - India 411018

Dr. (col.) Samar K Biswas
Department of Orthopaedics, Padmashree Dr. D. Y. PatResil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centr, - India 411018

Dr. Rohit Malhotra
Department of orthopaedics, Padmashree Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research centre, , - India

ORTHOPAEDICS

Subtrochanteric fracture, Dynamic hip screw, Osteoporosis, Tibia fracture

Salgia A, Khan F, Biswas K, Malhotra R. Pathological Fracture of Femur - A Case Report. WebmedCentral ORTHOPAEDICS 2012;3(12):WMC003917
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2012.003917

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
No
Submitted on: 27 Dec 2012 09:22:24 AM GMT
Published on: 27 Dec 2012 10:36:43 AM GMT

Abstract


Background: Fractures of the subtrochanteric region of the femur provide several challenges to the operating surgeon due to anatomic and biomechanical peculiarities inherent to this region. These challenges are compounded several times in a severely osteoporotic bone.

Case presentation: We report a case of pathological fracture following Vitamin D3 deficiency. The patient had sustained a subtrochanteric fracture of left femur & incomplete fracture of right tibia which was managed with a DHS (Dynamic Hip Screw) and PTB (Patella Tendon Bearing) cast respectively for the two different fractures.

Conclusion: This highlights the fact that pathological fracture can be due to Vitamin D3 deficiency, but needs to be differentiated from other causes of pathological fracture like infection or neoplastic conditions. While DHS provides a viable alternative in the management of fractures of the subtrochanteric region of femur in severe osteoporosis, incomplete fracture of tibia can be treated with PTB cast.

Introduction


The existence of osteoporosis has been documented in Egyptians as far back as 990 B.C. [1].The incidence of fragility fractures around the hip is rising exponentially [2]. These fractures account for a significant economic burden on the health care system of a country [3]. Subtrochanteric fractures of femur pose significant challenges for fixation in terms of anatomic and biomechanical reasons. These include a very high stress across the medial cortex (1200 lb/sq inch), smaller cross sectional area and the occurrence of shear forces across the fracture. These challenges are further compounded by the presence of powerful muscle vectors [4]. The major problem in fractures of the osteoporotic bone is fixation of the device to the bone as bone failure is commoner than implant breakage. We report a case with subtrochanteric fracture of the left femur with Singh's grade one osteoporosis & incomplete fracture of right tibia which was managed by fixation with a DHS and PTB cast respectively. At six months follow-up the patient had a normal range of motion and was pain free.

Case Report(s)


A 68 year old female patient reported to the outdoor department of our hospital with a history of sudden onset of pain in her left hip and right leg. There was no history of trauma, fever or weight loss. The left lower extremity was externally rotated and shortened, while there was only tenderness in the proximal metaphyseal region of right tibia. Movements elicited pain in the area of the left hip and right knee. Radiographs of the pelvis with both hip and left femur lateral views revealed a transverse fracture at the subtrochanteric region of left femur which was displaced (Figure 1). While radiograph of both knee antero-posterior & lateral views (Figure 2) showed incomplete fracture of right tibia, involving the medial cortex of the proximal metaphyseal region. On assessing the trabeculae pattern of the femur the patient was found to have Singh's grade one osteoporosis with near absence of the trabeculae in the femoral head and neck. Her serological investigation showed, 25-OH Vitamin D Total levels as 10.82 ng/ml (reference range of 6-20 ng/ml as insufficiency). Her blood calcium and phosphorus levels were normal. Dual X-Ray absorbsiometry showed a T score greater than 2.5 standard deviations below normal. Other investigations were done like urine for Bence Jone’s protein and lateral X-ray of skull (Figure 3) to rule out multiple myeloma as a cause of pathological fracture, which were negative. X-rays of Dorso-Lumbar spine (Figure 4) was also done to check for any signs of metastases or any infective etiology which were negative in this case. The patient was put on skin traction for the left lower limb and advised to undergo surgery for the subtrochanteric fracture of left femur in view of the nature of the fracture and the requirement of early ambulation. Patient was taken for surgery and the fracture was reduced on a traction table after opening the fracture area. Fixation was held with a DHS and 135 degree barrel plate. In view of the tenuous nature of the fracture a 9 holes barrel plate was affixed with 7 cortical screws (Figure 5). For the right sided incomplete tibia fracture PTB cast was given. Post operatively the patient underwent supervised physiotherapy over a period of six weeks. She was also treated with injectable Vitamin D (Arachitol) 6,00,000 units intramuscularly, along with oral calcium citrate 1gm daily and Vitamin D3 orally 60,000 units once weekly. At twelve weeks the fracture had united and the patient was allowed full weight bearing (Figure 6).

Discussion


In planning treatment in older patients with fractures of the osteoporotic bone, several important factors are to be considered. The functional demands of the elderly are different from young healthy and long term immobilization in bed must be avoided. Delaying treatment has been reported to increase mortality [5]. Reduced bone mass, increase bone brittleness and medullary expansion must be factored in when deciding the type of surgical method to be used. Improved implant design and surgical techniques are in a constant race to keep pace with increasing demands for stable fixation of these fractures. Immobilization in splints and cast causes further immobilization resulting in stiffness and worsening the osteoporosis. A cast also does not control fracture shortening which is often seen in osteoporotic bone. Various implants have been used for fracture fixation in the upper femur. These include ender nails, short femoral nails, sliding hip screws, fixed nail plate, Kuntscher nail and percutaneous compression plate. Many series report complications with these methods. However none of these series exclusively focus on cases with severe osteoporosis with cortices as thin as found in our patient. Among the most common treatments for extra-capsular fractures, the average rate of cut out was 2.6% in patients receiving a short femoral nail, 3.1% in those receiving a sliding hip screw, 3.6% in those receiving a Medoff sliding plate and 6.7% in those receiving an Ender nail. Operative fractures of the femur occurred in 2.4% of those receiving Ender nail and in 2.7% in short femoral nails. The rate of operative fractures was negligible in those receiving a sliding hip screw (0.4%). The overall average rate of valgus deformity was 7.7% and that of leg shortening 9.4% [6]. A study conducted by Yoshmine et al on bones with grade 1to3 osteoporosis showed a cut out rate of 36% [7].

Conclusion


The DHS provides a good alternative to intramedullary nails in the fixation of subtrochanteric fracture in the severely osteoporotic bone. Although the cause of osteoporosis must also be taken care of, which in this case was Vitamin D insufficiency.

Abbreviations(s)


DHS: Dynamic Hip Screw
PTB: Patella Tendon Bearing

References


1. Dequeker J, Ortner OJ, Stix AI, et al.: Hip fracture and osteoporosis in a XII dynasty female skeleton from Lisht, upper Egypt. J Bone Miner Res 1997, 12:881-888.
2. Benger U: Epidemiological changes over 30 years in an urban population. In Thesis Lund University, Lund Sweden; 1987.
3. Praemer A, Furner S, Rice D: Musculoskeletal condition in the United States. Park ridge, IL; American academy of orthopaedic surgeon; 1992.
4. Warwick DJ, Circhlow TPKR, Langkamer VG, Jackson M: The dynamic condylar screw in the management of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Injury 1995, 26(4):241-244.
5. Casaletto JA, Gatt R: Post-operative mortality related to waiting time for hip fracture surgery. Injury 2004, 35:114-120.
6. Goldhahn J, Suhm N, Goldhahan S, Blauth M, Hanson B: Influence of osteoporosis on fracture fixation – a systemic literature review. Osteoporos Int 2008, 19(6): 761-72.
7. Yoshimine F, Latta LL, Milne EL: Sliding characteristics of compression hip screws in the intertrochanteric fracture: a clinical study. J Orthop Trauma 1993, 7: 348-353.

Source(s) of Funding


None

Competing Interests


None

Disclaimer


This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

Reviews
0 reviews posted so far

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)