My opinion
 

By Dr. Deepak Gupta , Dr. Jose Bonilla , Dr. Nancy Ghaleb , Dr. Kamran Iftikhar
Corresponding Author Dr. Deepak Gupta
Wayne State University, - United States of America
Submitting Author Dr. Deepak Gupta
Other Authors Dr. Jose Bonilla
Detroit Medical Center, Anesthesiology, - United States of America

Dr. Nancy Ghaleb
Detroit Medical Center, Anesthesiology, - United States of America

Dr. Kamran Iftikhar
Detroit Medical Center, Anesthesiology, - United States of America

ANAESTHESIA

Nasopharyngeal Airway, Suction Catheter

Gupta D, Bonilla J, Ghaleb N, Iftikhar K. Nasopharyngeal Airway As An Alternative Suction Catheter. WebmedCentral ANAESTHESIA 2022;13(9):WMC005797

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
No
Submitted on: 25 Sep 2022 11:39:22 AM GMT
Published on: 28 Sep 2022 01:53:16 AM GMT

My opinion


Nasopharyngeal airway (NPA) can be safely inserted to open the airway and to keep the airway open in the unconscious, sedated or anesthetized (USA) patient except when basal skull fracture or severe coagulopathy is suspected. The NPA may be especially helpful when patient’s mouth cannot be opened to place an oropharyngeal airway or suction catheter. Now the question arises whether the NPA itself can be used as suction catheter for clearing pharyngeal secretions. Herein, the imaged manikin depicts conversion of a NPA into a suction catheter using a 5-in-1 tubing connector (51TC) (see arrowhead in Figure). A 51TC can fit on 5-11 mm (3/16″, 1/4″, 5/16″, 3/8″, 7/16″) internal diameter (ID) tubes [1]. In the image, the 51TC is connected to an 8 mm ID NPA and 9/32" (7.1 mm) ID suction tubing. As the adult-sized NPA ID ranges from 6-9 mm, the 51TC will always come in handy. The appropriately sized NPA stays 1 cm above epiglottis [2-3]. Thus, the question arises whether NPA will safely suction oropharyngeal and laryngopharyngeal secretions from semi-closed pharyngeal cavity when contralateral nasal cavity is open to atmosphere and oral cavity has not been manually apposed or sealed shut especially in intubated patients unless NPA gets stuck behind an upper-airway-obstructing tongue. Usually, the USA patient is nursed in supine position with head up to prevent laryngopharyngeal reflux. However, when suspected of ongoing laryngopharyngeal reflux, the USA patient is routinely turned to slight Trendelenburg position with head down to drive secretions away from laryngeal inlet. Herein, gravity can move laryngopharyngeal and oropharyngeal secretions towards the NPA [4]. Few questions remain: Will using the NPA as a suction catheter injure pharyngeal tissue or inspissate suctioned secretions within the NPA? Like SSCOR DuCanto Catheter® [5] but unlike the split NPA [6], the scarcely if any available fenestrated NPA [7-9] with distal tip having minute side-eyes may come in handy for entraining air to prevent it from catching pharyngeal tissue. To counter inspissated suctioned secretions within the NPA, a contralateral NPA placement or pre-existing double-barrel NPA [10] in-situ may maintain airway patency during suctioning of laryngopharyngeal and oropharyngeal secretions. Summarily, only time will tell whether this manikin-based in vitro presentation will lead to use of NPA as successful, safe and common alternative suction catheter in vivo.   

Reference(s)


  1. 5-in-1 Tubing Connector. https://busseinc.com/product/5-in-1-tubing-connector/
  2. Estimation of nares-to-epiglottis distance for selecting an appropriate nasopharyngeal airway. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417616/
  3. The nasopharyngeal airway: Assessment of position by fibreoptic laryngoscopy. https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2044. 1993.tb07119.x
  4. Nasopharyngeal airway insertion. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/image?imageKey=EM%2F79849
  5. SSCOR DuCanto Catheter®. https://www.sscor.com/ducanto_catheter
  6. Nasal fiberoptic intubation with and without split nasopharyngeal airway: Time to view the larynx & intubate. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110184918300199
  7. The fenestrated nasopharyngeal airway. https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2044. 1995.tb06062.x
  8. Fenestrated nasopharyngeal airway for drainage. https://patents.google.com/patent/US5664567
  9. A modified nasal trumpet to facilitate fibreoptic intubation. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091217368320
  10. Double Barrel Nasal Trumpets to Prevent Upper Airway Obstruction after Nasal and Non-Nasal Surgery. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/arp/2018/8567516/

Source(s) of Funding


NOT APPLICABLE

Competing Interests


NOT APPLICABLE

Reviews
0 reviews posted so far

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
1 comment posted so far

THE FIGURE ASSOCIATED WITH THE ARTICLE Posted by Dr. Deepak Gupta on 09 Oct 2022 07:32:53 PM GMT

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)