None.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The purpose of the present essay is to suggest a possible model to describe the worldwide healthcare crisis, where diseases that have been considered to be eradicated or under our control are re-emerging today.

Poliomyelitis that once plagued humanity is still a pandemic disease again [1]. In 1916 in the USA, there were 23,000 documented cases causing more 5,000 deaths [2]. Moreover, the poliomyelitis epidemic began to grow after World War II [2], and for this reason, the 41st World Health Assembly meeting in Geneva in 1998 committed the World Health Organization (WHO) to commence a global campaign to eradicate poliomyelitis [3]. The goal has not been achieved as there have been recent outbreaks in Congo [4], Tajikistan [5] and Venezuela [6], and a clear example shown in the Figure 1 illustrates a recent poliomyelitis outbreak in Pakistan. Another example of an epidemic is malaria. It is estimated that one half of the worldwide population is at risk of being infected with malaria with two to three million people dying annually as a result of it. In 2007, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) reported that the disease had affected twenty-one countries throughout the Americas with approximately 880 million people of which 236 million live in endemic areas and 276 million live in areas at risk of transmission [7]. Currently, there is hope that an effective malaria vaccine called RTS, S/AS02 will prove effective based on studies performed in Mozambique in 2009 [8].The malaria parasite mutates to avoid the effects of this vaccine and has proven to be effective for only a limited duration of approximately 45 months [8]. Based on these two examples, we raise a simple question: Is it possible to eradicate diseases worldwide or is there a cyclical nature to the increase and decrease of a pandemic disease? A possible answer to this question may be obtained from an analysis of a modification of the predator-prey equations as will be demonstrated below.Let us assume that the dependent variable well represents the population of well people and the dependent variable sick represents the population of sick people that reside on the earth. At the present time, the overall population is increasing in time due to the increasing birthrate throughout the world. This increase in the well population will be represented with the coefficient Î±. The increasing population of well people will encounter a number of sick people who could infect the well people and the infection rate is represented with the coefficient Î². We would expect a certain proportion of the sick population will recover and become members of the well population and this is represented with the coefficient Î³. Equation 1: Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The population of sick people will decrease as the sickest of the sick pass away and are buried in the ground. This is described with the coefficient Î´. The burial of the sick population fertilizes the ground that will in turn enhance the food production for the well people and their population will be in turn affected and this is described with the coefficient Îµ. Equation 2: Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Equations (1) and (2) have been recently examined with reference to the problem of global warming caused by the production of carbon dioxide [9]. In addition, there has been a detailed study of the mathematical behavior of these two equations in the regions surrounding the equilibrium points [10].Â Asymptotically, there are two long-term equilibrium points for these equations. The first one is the equilibrium point at the origin, ie.,Â wellÂ = 0 andÂ sickÂ = 0. The second equilibrium point is given by. Equation 3: Â Â Â and Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Equations (1) and (2) with the coefficient Î³=0 are just a reinterpretation of the well-known predator-prey model equations. These equations have been used to describe the temporal evolution of the population of rabbits (prey) and the population of foxes (predator) in a closed environment such as an island. As the population of the rabbits increases, they in turn become food for the foxes. As the food supply for the rabbits increases, the population of the foxes also increases resulting in an eventual decrease in the population of the rabbits. The decrease of the rabbit population will then cause a decrease in the population of the foxes and the scenario repeats itself. This process is also called the Lotka-Volterra model in honor of their independent description of these equations in 1925-26 [11]. The solution of the predator-prey equations (or Lotka-Volterra model) is shown in Figure 2 where we have arbitrarily chosen numerical values for the coefficients of equations (1) to (3) and thus emphasize the oscillatory behavior that may extend over thousands of years. The cases of polio in Pakistan exhibits such a tendency as shown in Figure 1. The numerical values that were used in the simulation are included in the figure caption. The major result of this calculation is to demonstrate that both the sick and the well populations are almost periodic in time in that as the number of well people initially increases, there will unfortunately be an acompanying increase in the number of sick people. The peak population of the sick people is delayed in time from the peak population of well people. There will be a time separation between the maximum total population which is also shown in Figure 2 and the maximum of either the well or sick populations will eventually decay to the equilibrium states given in (3).Hopefully this cyclical nature of the populations of well and sick people will follow in the footsteps of a smallpox virus which was once the scourge of humanity eliminating the further need to study the smallpox sick population using this very simple model.

1. Newsom SWB. The history of infection control: Poliomyelitis part 1: Ancient Egypt to 1950 â a disease uncontrolled. Br J Infect Control. 2005; 6: 614-616.2. Trevelyan B, Smallman-Raynor M, Cliff AD. The spatial structure of epidemic emergence: geographical aspects of poliomyelitis in north-eastern USA, JulyâOctober 1916. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A Stat Soc. 2005;168: 701â722.3. Goodman T, Dalmiya N, de Benoist B, Schultink W. Polio as a platform: using national immunization days to deliver vitamin A supplements. Bull World Health Organ 2000; 78: 305-314.4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Poliomyelitis outbreak--Republic of the Congo, September 2010-February 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60: 312-313.5. Macdonald N, HÃ©bert PC. Polio outbreak in Tajikistanis cause for alarm. CMAJ. 2010; 182: 1013-1013.6. EchezurÃa E. The status of poliomyelitis in Venezuela. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1974; 8: 66-71.7. Isea R. IdentificaciÃ³n de once candidatos vacunales potenciales contra la malaria por medio de la BioinformÃ¡tica. Vaccimonitor.Â 2010; 19: 15-19.8. Sacarlal J, Aide P, Aponte JJ, Renom M, Leach A, Mandomando I, et al. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of the RTS.S/AS02A. Malaria Vaccine in Mozambican Children. J Infect. Dis. 2009; 200: 329-336.9. Lonngren KE, Bai EW. On the global warming problem due to carbon dioxide. Energy Policy. 2008; 36: 1567-1568.10. Schaffer WM. Human population and carbon dioxide. Energy Policy. 2008; 36: 2761-2764.11. Berryman AA. The Origins and Evolution of Predator-Prey Theory. Ecology. 1992; 73: 1530-1535