Home » WebmedCentral Testimonials

  • WebmedCentral Testimonials

Displaying 2281-2300 of 2385 testimonials
  • "I great idea to link up scientist of common yet diverse interests." - Mr. Vincent Okungu, Research Officer, KEMRI-WT, UCT, Kenya. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "I think the mode of diffusion of medical informations that animates WebmedCentral is a modern way of understanding the formation and updating of doctors." - Prof. Paolo Sossai, Chief, Department of Medicine, General Hospital of Urbino, Italy. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "Long overdue to implement these ideas!  " - Dr. Colin Anderson, Associate Professor, University of Alberta, Canada. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "A liquid faculty in a liquid world. What a great idea" - Prof. Giovanni Gambassi, Head, Geriatric Division, Centro Medicina Invecchiamento, University, Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Italy. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "I think this is an excellent idea." - Dr. Josette Bettany-Saltikov, Senior lecturer in Research Methods, Teesside University, United Kingdom. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "I think a great idea that will undoubtedly improve the dissemination of disciplines such as psychology." - Mr. Carlos Salavera, Doctor, University of Saragossa, Spain. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "Excellent platform for dissemination of scientific information and opportunity for greater interaction of scientific community. It has the potentiality to become a reliable source of evidence base and to generate meaningful discussions and debate." - Dr. Nilamadhab Kar, Consultant Psychiatrist, Wolverhampton City PCT, United Kingdom. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "Easy online access to valuable material." - Dr. Rubina Naqvi, Associate Professor, Nephrology, SIUT, Pakistan. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "Great" - Dr. Sarosh Khan, Senior Consultant, Modern Hospital, Srinagar, Kashmir, India. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "A great idea with remarkable contribution to scientific community." - Dr. Balendra Pratap Singh, Assistant professor, Department of prosthdontics, KGMC, India. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "Open Research and Innovation is necessary nowadays. This kind of initiatives could provide a multidisciplinar, global and international vision on the different research areas and sicentific fields." - Ms. Diana De la Iglesia, Researcher, Project Manager, Biomedical Informatics Group, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Spain. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "I appreciate the concept, however, as I have commented earlier, some degree of monitoring is needed. Good articles should be separated from the useless articles. May be temporary and permanent placing of articles will help." - Prof. Prasunpriya Nayak, Professor, Department of Physiology, NRI Medical College & General Hospital, NRI Academy of Sciences. , India. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "WebmedCentral is a wonderful way of staying connected with international academic elite community and keeping up with the current trends." - Mr. Krishna Kumar Govindarajan, Assistant Professor Paediatric Surgery, JIPMER, Puducherry, India, India. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "The idea behind Webmed Central is unique and provides the platform for the quick and precise evaluation of the research articles." - Mr. Randhir Dahiya, Associate Prof, Maharishi Markandshwar Univeristy, India. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "The  idea behind WebmedCentral is novel and great. Many authors of scientific manuscripts go through difficulties and several months of delay to have their work published. Often times, after waiting for months, journal's Editor writes that they have had many manuscripts submitted which made the Editorial Board unable to review the manuscript. The post-publication peer review process of WebmedCentral will definitely be welcome by many authors in the scientific community." - Dr. Babasola Okusanya, Consultant, Obstetrics And Gynaecology, Nigeria. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "I think WebmedCentral's strategy and intentions are excellent and I applaud them. I would very much welcome becoming a Faculty Lead in eg Neurology, Psychology, or related discipline." - Dr. Simon Thompson, Associate Professor, Psychology Research Centre , Bournemouth University, United Kingdom. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "There is a great potential behind Webmed Central and the idea of post publication review is certainly feasible. " - Dr. Yeong Y Lee, Physician, Senior lecturer, Medicine, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "Its a highway for scientific research which provide equal opportunity to every finding of biomedical research to speak before world.  " - Dr. Lavkush Dwivedi, Assistant Professor, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, India. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "Vote of support" - Dr. Deepak Kejariwal, Consultant Gastroenterologist, University Hospital of North Durham, United Kingdom. on 16th Sep 2011
  • "I consider an honor your invitation to participate as an advisor to your journal. I think your approach combining open publication format and pre-review publication overcomes the fundamental deficiencies of the current academic publication system. Being a member of Editorial Boards of 7 professional journals, I see among fundamental deficiencies of the current system, long publication delays and reviewers conflict of interest. Deficiencies of the current system: Finding qualified reviewers often is difficult. We, Editors have to resort to reviews by former co-authors (usually exaggeratedly positive). If the reviews are written by authorities in the field, they are decisively negative, especially in case of good, innovative papers. More often reviews are written by graduate students who’s outlook is limited by views of their professors. They do not have a broad view and do not understand innovations. As a result, it is easy to publish mediocre paper, but very difficult to publish innovative papers. Sometimes I have to appeal to Editor-in-Chief or to use my own Editor-in-Chief power to overwrite opinions of unqualified reviewers. And still I am thankful even to poorly qualified reviewers, for agreeing to invest their time in reviewing papers. The result is that even highly rated journals publish a significant number of third-rated papers. Advantages of open, post-publication review system: Your editorial philosophy of open, post-publication reviews overcomes these difficulties. First, publications speed up by months, which is extremely important in current fast-paced academic process. Second, reviews are becoming publications in themselves, and reviewers take an authorship interest and responsibilities in their reviews. I see it as the future of academic publishing, and believe that WebmedCentral will overtake current academic journals. I am glad to take part in this transformational process, and will be glad advising WebmedCentral Team on improving your journal." - Dr. Leonid Perlovsky, Doctor, Visiting Scholar, Principal Research Physicist and Technical Advisor at the Air Force Resear, Harvard University, United States of America. on 16th Sep 2011
 
 
We use cookies on this website to measure and improve performance. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.