-
Reviews
Back to Reviews
Submited on: 29 Sep 2010 02:15:04 AM GMT
Published on: 29 Sep 2010 08:05:13 AM GMT
- Other Comments: Well written and appropriate design. Although, the technique didn't quite match up with the gold standard. A correction is needed!
-
Competing interests:
None
-
Invited by the author to review this article? :
Yes -
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
-
References:
None -
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
Anesthesiology - How to cite: Apuya J .Non-Invasive Rodent Cardiac Output: Comparison Of A Compact Clinical Monitor With Echocardiography [Review of the article 'Non-Invasive Rodent Cardiac Output: Comparison of a Compact Clinical Monitor with Echocardiography ' by Venkatesh B].WebmedCentral 2010;1(11):WMCRW00109
The study has an appropriate design and the observations have been vividly described. However, I would like to make following comments for possible clarification/ inclusion:
None
No
No
None
Over 3 decades