Submited on: 01 Dec 2011 10:12:42 PM GMT
Published on: 02 Dec 2011 06:36:52 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:
    We need current references, 2009-2011.
  • Competing interests:
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:


  • How to cite:  Garcia G .Immune Response of IL-4-Knockout Mice to Lowe-Dose Immunization with Autologous IL-4.[Review of the article 'Immune Response of IL-4-Knockout Mice to Low-Dose Immunization with Autologous IL-4 ' by Shichkin V].WebmedCentral 2011;2(12):WMCRW001218
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
Dear Dr. Guadalupe GarcĂ­a, Thanks a lot for your reviewing of my paper. I fully agree with your valuable remark concerning the reference list. I'll try upgrade it soon. Sincerely, Prof. Valentin Shichkin
Responded by Prof. Valentin Shichkin on 08 Dec 2011 10:51:52 AM