Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Yes
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
Yes
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
No
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
Yes
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
Yes
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
Yes
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
No
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
Yes
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
Yes
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
Yes
Other Comments:
Title: A word is missing(underlined). The influence of
Abstract: Under methods, spelling of Gardnerella is wrong. Under results, nothing is said about educational status which is the focus of the study.
Introduction: A word is missing in line 10. Cervical cytology has been found to be very helpful. See underlined.
Materials/Methods: Line 14 is an incomplete sentence.
Competing interests: None
Invited by the author to review this article? : Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: Yes
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
Similar.
How to cite: Ugboma H A.The influence of educational status on genital tract infections[Review of the article 'The Influence Educational Status on Genital Tract Infections ' by Nggada H].WebmedCentral 2011;2(12):WMCRW001223
Title: A word is missing(underlined). The influence of
Abstract: Under methods, spelling of Gardnerella is wrong. Under results, nothing is said about educational status which is the focus of the study.
Introduction: A word is missing in line 10. Cervical cytology has been found to be very helpful. See underlined.
Materials/Methods: Line 14 is an incomplete sentence.
None
Yes
Yes
None
Similar.