Submited on: 24 Feb 2012 01:43:58 PM GMT
Published on: 25 Feb 2012 10:22:40 AM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Paper well structured presenting design of BNCT and imaging systems that can implemented around a Plasma Focus Neutron Source. I agree with the authors that the problem of neutron yield must be resolved before using such source for BNCT. In this case the proposed solutions are available and can be considered.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    General aspect

  • How to cite:  Nasri S .Feasibility of BNCT and Neutron Imaging with 1Hz, 5kJ Plasma Focus Neutron Source at the ICTP-MLAB Laboratory [Review of the article 'Feasibility of BNCT and Neutron Imaging with 1Hz, 5kJ Plasma Focus Neutron Source at the ICTP-MLAB Laboratory ' by Kharfi F].WebmedCentral 2012;3(3):WMCRW001632
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse