Submited on: 04 Apr 2012 06:11:24 AM GMT
Published on: 04 Apr 2012 04:15:32 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This is a good work, as suggested by the authors it needs more extensive study to confirm the findings and enforce into practice.  The authors themselves can conduct another study as they have the required subjects and condition with more stringent inclusion and exclusion criterias.  This article should go into regular medical journals for wider audience and more constructive comments.

  • Competing interests:
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    worked in malaria endemic area as Government medical officer

  • How to cite:  Satish N S.good study on use of alternative and better control of malaria[Review of the article 'Observational Study of Chemoprophylaxis with Chloroquine and Doxycycline on Incidence of Malaria in North-East Sector of India ' by Berad A].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001650
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse