Submited on: 07 Sep 2010 05:53:57 PM GMT
Published on: 07 Sep 2010 08:05:53 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Otoendoscopic picture of the vascular mass could have been provided.

    Contast CT / MRI images could have been provided as an illustration.  MRI image has been provided as an additional file.  Contrast CT images if provided could have made this paper more interesting.

  • Competing interests:
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
    1. (Complete and exhaustive article) 2. (This link includes a video)
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am Professor of Otolaryngology.  I have successfully treated / operated on 5 patients of glomus jugulare

  • How to cite:  Thiagarajan B .Glomus jugulare A case of secretory glomus jugulare with review of literature[Review of the article 'Glomus Jugulare: A Case Of Secretory Glomus Jugulare With Review Of Literature ' by Lateef Chisti M].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001721
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse