Posted by Dr. Veena K Karanth on 06 Jun 2014 12:27:26 PM GMTReviewed by
WMC Editors
What are the main claims of the paper and how important are they?
A new technique with good results
Are these claims novel? If not, please specify papers that weaken the claims to the originality of this one.
Yes
Are the claims properly placed in the context of the previous literature?
Yes
Do the results support the claims? If not, what other evidence is required?
Yes
If a protocol is provided, for example for a randomized controlled trial, are there any important deviations from it? If so, have the authors explained adequately why the deviations occurred?
NA
Is the methodology valid? Does the paper offer enough details of its methodology that its experiments or its analyses could be reproduced?
NA
Would any other experiments or additional information improve the paper? How much better would the paper be if this extra work was done, and how difficult would such work be to do, or to provide?
NA
Is this paper outstanding in its discipline? (For example, would you like to see this work presented in a seminar at your hospital or university? Do you feel these results need to be incorporated in your next general lecture on the subject?) If yes, what makes it outstanding? If not, why not?
Yes
Other Comments:
NA
Competing interests: None
Invited by the author to review this article? : Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
No
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
General and Laparoscopic surgeon
How to cite: Karanth V K.Double camera and four portal technique for tumoral excision at the posterior knee space[Review of the article 'Double camera and four portal technique for tumoral excision at the posterior knee space ' by G. Cimiano J].WebmedCentral 2014;5(6):WMCRW003060
A new technique with good results
Yes
Yes
Yes
NA
NA
NA
Yes
NA
None
Yes
No
No
General and Laparoscopic surgeon